[Tue Mar  6 10:22:19 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (231.1, 210.9) = 0 56 5.83 26 19 9.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 91.6 +/- 20.5
  Background counts = 144.9
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0009

[Tue Mar  6 10:22:19 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.01'
[Tue Mar  6 10:27:03 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.43 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar  6 10:27:03 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.43"
[Tue Mar  6 10:27:03 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.071
[Tue Mar  6 10:27:03 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 77 for pass 0, mean size = 10.43"
[Tue Mar  6 14:48:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src77.ximg exists
[Tue Mar  6 14:48:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src77.csv
[Tue Mar  6 14:48:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src77_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar  6 14:48:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src77.csv
[Tue Mar  6 14:48:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src77_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src77.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar  6 14:48:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src77.ximg exists
[Tue Mar  6 14:48:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src77.csv
[Tue Mar  6 14:48:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src77_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar  6 14:48:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src77.csv
[Tue Mar  6 14:48:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src77_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src77.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:06 2012] Warning, spatial fit 77 centroid is now closest to src. 82
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:06 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:06 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:06 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:06 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:06 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Mar  6 22:09:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.43 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar  6 22:09:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.43"
[Tue Mar  6 22:09:10 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.071
[Tue Mar  6 22:09:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 59 for pass 1, mean size = 10.43"
[Wed Mar  7 01:58:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 01:58:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59.csv
[Wed Mar  7 01:58:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 01:58:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59.csv
[Wed Mar  7 01:58:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src59.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar  7 01:58:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 01:58:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59.csv
[Wed Mar  7 01:58:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 01:58:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59.csv
[Wed Mar  7 01:58:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src59.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar  7 07:55:07 2012] Source 81 is offset by -1.430742 and -0.598839 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.198138 x 1.198138, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Mar  7 07:55:07 2012] Warning: source 59 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 81 at 13.118718 pixels away
[Wed Mar  7 07:55:07 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Mar  7 07:55:07 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Mar  7 07:55:07 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Mar  7 07:55:07 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Mar  7 07:55:07 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Mar  7 07:55:07 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9