[Tue Mar  6 10:22:19 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (220.6, 179.5) = 0 56 9.21 26 16 46.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 99.1 +/- 14.5
  Background counts = 77.4
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Tue Mar  6 10:22:19 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.31'
[Tue Mar  6 10:27:03 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.58 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar  6 10:27:03 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.58"
[Tue Mar  6 10:27:03 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 33, frac = 0.825
[Tue Mar  6 10:27:03 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 69 for pass 0, mean size = 11.58"
[Tue Mar  6 14:48:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.ximg exists
[Tue Mar  6 14:48:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.csv
[Tue Mar  6 14:48:36 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar  6 14:48:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.csv
[Tue Mar  6 14:48:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar  6 14:48:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.ximg exists
[Tue Mar  6 14:48:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.csv
[Tue Mar  6 14:48:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar  6 14:48:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.csv
[Tue Mar  6 14:48:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:06 2012] Warning: source 69 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 72 at 13.212400 pixels away
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:06 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:06 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:06 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:06 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:06 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Mar  6 22:09:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.58 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar  6 22:09:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.58"
[Tue Mar  6 22:09:10 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 33, frac = 0.825
[Tue Mar  6 22:09:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 53 for pass 1, mean size = 11.58"
[Wed Mar  7 01:58:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src53.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 01:58:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src53.csv
[Wed Mar  7 01:58:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src53_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 01:58:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src53.csv
[Wed Mar  7 01:58:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src53_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src53.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar  7 01:58:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src53.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 01:58:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src53.csv
[Wed Mar  7 01:58:44 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src53_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 01:58:44 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src53.csv
[Wed Mar  7 01:58:44 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src53_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src53.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar  7 07:55:07 2012] Warning: source 53 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 72 at 15.144046 pixels away
[Wed Mar  7 07:55:07 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Mar  7 07:55:07 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Mar  7 07:55:07 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Mar  7 07:55:07 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Mar  7 07:55:07 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Mar  7 07:55:07 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0