[Tue Mar 6 10:23:36 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (470.3, 266.6) = 0 54 48.40 26 23 4.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 37.0 +/- 8.8 Background counts = 13.6 Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.0002 [Tue Mar 6 10:23:37 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.67' [Tue Mar 6 18:24:41 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.76 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Mar 6 18:24:41 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.76" [Tue Mar 6 18:24:41 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 47, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.039 [Tue Mar 6 18:24:41 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 69 for pass 0, mean size = 12.76" [Tue Mar 6 22:07:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.ximg exists [Tue Mar 6 22:07:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.csv [Tue Mar 6 22:07:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 6 22:07:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.csv [Tue Mar 6 22:07:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Mar 6 22:07:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.ximg exists [Tue Mar 6 22:07:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.csv [Tue Mar 6 22:07:40 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 6 22:07:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.csv [Tue Mar 6 22:07:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Mar 6 22:08:05 2012] Warning, spatial fit 29 centroid is now closest to src. 33 [Tue Mar 6 22:08:06 2012] Warning, spatial fit 82 centroid is now closest to src. 86 [Tue Mar 6 22:08:24 2012] Warning, spatial fit 27 centroid is now closest to src. 48 [Tue Mar 6 22:08:25 2012] Warning, spatial fit 55 centroid is now closest to src. 65 [Tue Mar 6 22:08:45 2012] Warning, spatial fit 39 centroid is now closest to src. 42 [Tue Mar 6 22:08:45 2012] Warning, spatial fit 42 centroid is now closest to src. 67 [Tue Mar 6 22:08:45 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 129.711000, observed total counts = 109.000000 [Tue Mar 6 22:08:45 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 53 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Tue Mar 6 22:08:45 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Mar 6 22:08:45 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Mar 6 22:08:45 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Mar 6 22:08:45 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Mar 6 22:08:45 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Mar 6 22:08:45 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9