[Tue Mar  6 10:23:33 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (255.0, 223.6) = 0 55 58.09 26 20 0.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 359.8 +/- 25.1
  Background counts = 62.3
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0008

[Tue Mar  6 10:23:37 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.27'
[Tue Mar  6 18:24:41 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar  6 18:24:41 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.57"
[Tue Mar  6 18:24:41 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.721
[Tue Mar  6 18:24:41 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 0, mean size = 9.57"
[Tue Mar  6 22:07:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg exists
[Tue Mar  6 22:07:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Tue Mar  6 22:07:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar  6 22:07:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Tue Mar  6 22:07:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar  6 22:07:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Tue Mar  6 22:07:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Tue Mar  6 22:07:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar  6 22:07:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Tue Mar  6 22:07:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:45 2012] Warning, spatial fit 6 centroid is now closest to src. 8
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:45 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:45 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:45 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:45 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:45 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:45 2012] Source is confused with source 8
[Wed Mar  7 04:56:58 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Mar  7 04:56:58 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.57"
[Wed Mar  7 04:56:58 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.721
[Wed Mar  7 04:56:58 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 1, mean size = 9.57"
[Wed Mar  7 07:54:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 07:54:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Wed Mar  7 07:54:48 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 07:54:48 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Wed Mar  7 07:54:48 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar  7 07:54:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 07:54:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Wed Mar  7 07:54:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Wed Mar  7 07:54:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Wed Mar  7 07:54:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Mar  7 07:55:30 2012] Warning, spatial fit 6 centroid is now closest to src. 8
[Wed Mar  7 07:55:30 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1685.720000, observed total counts = 1662.000000
[Wed Mar  7 07:55:30 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 5 = 0.911286 pixels
[Wed Mar  7 07:55:30 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 6 to 14
[Wed Mar  7 07:55:30 2012] 1607.792900 total counts/ 1571.680000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.910920
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 5 = 0.911286 pixels
  Position = (255.8, 224.0) = 0 55 57.83 26 20 1.2
  Extent = 4.0 (2.3-7.1)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 36.1 +/- 40.1
  Background counts = 1571.7
  Rate = 0.0009 +/- 0.0009
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability