[Tue Mar  6 10:23:33 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (266.9, 300.0) = 0 55 54.24 26 25 32.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 345.9 +/- 28.5
  Background counts = 83.4
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.0007

[Tue Mar  6 10:23:37 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.29'
[Tue Mar  6 18:24:41 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar  6 18:24:41 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.57"
[Tue Mar  6 18:24:41 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.797
[Tue Mar  6 18:24:41 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 7.57"
[Tue Mar  6 22:07:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Mar  6 22:07:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Tue Mar  6 22:07:37 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar  6 22:07:37 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Tue Mar  6 22:07:37 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar  6 22:07:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Mar  6 22:07:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar  6 22:07:39 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:45 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 4893.390000, observed total counts = 3983.000000
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:45 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 16
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:45 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2780.300000, observed total counts = 2715.000000
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:45 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 16 = 0.785354 pixels
[Tue Mar  6 22:08:45 2012] 2778.044400 total counts/ 2752.230000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.492062
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 16 = 0.785354 pixels
  Position = (266.4, 300.5) = 0 55 54.42 26 25 34.1
  Extent = 3.3 (1.9-7.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 25.8 +/- 52.7
  Background counts = 2752.2
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.001
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability