[Tue Mar 6 10:22:56 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (220.0, 179.1) = 0 56 9.39 26 16 46.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 52.8 +/- 11.4 Background counts = 32.0 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005 [Tue Mar 6 10:22:57 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.35' [Tue Mar 6 14:48:40 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.61 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Mar 6 14:48:40 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.61" [Tue Mar 6 14:48:40 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.897 [Tue Mar 6 14:48:40 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 44 for pass 0, mean size = 11.61" [Tue Mar 6 18:24:38 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src44.ximg exists [Tue Mar 6 18:24:38 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src44_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 6 18:24:38 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src44 appears to have run properly [Tue Mar 6 18:24:40 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src44.ximg exists [Tue Mar 6 18:24:40 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src44_1.ximg exists [Tue Mar 6 18:24:40 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src44 appears to have run properly [Tue Mar 6 22:08:25 2012] Warning: source 44 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 53 at 11.812902 pixels away [Tue Mar 6 22:08:25 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Mar 6 22:08:25 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Mar 6 22:08:25 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Mar 6 22:08:25 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Mar 6 22:08:25 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Mar 7 01:58:44 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.61 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Mar 7 01:58:44 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.61" [Wed Mar 7 01:58:44 2012] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 40, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.897 [Wed Mar 7 01:58:44 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 37 for pass 1, mean size = 11.61" [Wed Mar 7 04:56:57 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src37.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 04:56:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src37.csv [Wed Mar 7 04:56:57 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src37_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 04:56:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src37.csv [Wed Mar 7 04:56:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src37_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src37.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Mar 7 04:56:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src37.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 04:56:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src37_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 04:56:58 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0203220101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src37 appears to have run properly [Wed Mar 7 07:55:18 2012] Warning: source 37 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 53 at 11.655344 pixels away [Wed Mar 7 07:55:18 2012] Warning: source 45 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 53 at 12.933516 pixels away [Wed Mar 7 07:55:18 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Mar 7 07:55:18 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Mar 7 07:55:18 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Mar 7 07:55:18 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Mar 7 07:55:18 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Mar 7 07:55:18 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0