[Sun May 20 02:29:12 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (390.0, 351.1) = 17 45 15.56 -28 57 52.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 168.3 +/- 35.9
  Background counts = 626.0
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Sun May 20 02:29:15 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.66'
[Sun May 20 02:45:35 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 20 02:45:35 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.26"
[Sun May 20 02:45:35 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.102
[Sun May 20 02:45:35 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 94 for pass 0, mean size = 10.26"
[Sun May 20 11:21:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 11:21:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 11:21:01 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src94 appears to have run properly
[Sun May 20 11:21:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 11:21:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 11:21:03 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src94 appears to have run properly
[Mon May 21 00:16:38 2012] Source 113 is offset by 5.815185 and -0.656067 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.151007 x 1.151007, not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 21 00:16:39 2012] Warning, spatial fit 94 centroid is now closest to src. 116
[Mon May 21 00:16:39 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 21 00:16:39 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 21 00:16:39 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 21 00:16:39 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 21 00:16:39 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 21 00:18:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 21 00:18:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.26"
[Mon May 21 00:18:31 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.102
[Mon May 21 00:18:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 85 for pass 1, mean size = 10.26"
[Mon May 21 11:25:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 11:25:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85.csv
[Mon May 21 11:25:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 11:25:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85.csv
[Mon May 21 11:25:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src85.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 21 11:25:32 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src85.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 11:25:32 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src85_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 21 11:25:32 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src85 appears to have run properly
[Tue May 22 01:39:14 2012] Source 113 is offset by 5.815185 and -0.656067 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.151007 x 1.151007, not incorporating fit results
[Tue May 22 01:39:15 2012] Warning, spatial fit 85 centroid is now closest to src. 109
[Tue May 22 01:39:15 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 22 01:39:15 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 22 01:39:15 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 22 01:39:15 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 22 01:39:15 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 22 01:39:15 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9