[Sun May 20 02:30:21 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (289.6, 351.9) = 17 45 48.85 -28 57 51.0 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 217.4 +/- 32.4 Background counts = 444.1 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003 [Sun May 20 02:30:24 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.93' [Sun May 20 11:21:03 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun May 20 11:21:03 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.39" [Sun May 20 11:21:03 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.059 [Sun May 20 11:21:03 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 65 for pass 0, mean size = 8.39" [Sun May 20 17:51:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65.ximg exists [Sun May 20 17:51:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65.csv [Sun May 20 17:51:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65_1.ximg exists [Sun May 20 17:51:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65.csv [Sun May 20 17:51:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun May 20 17:51:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src65.ximg exists [Sun May 20 17:51:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src65_1.ximg exists [Sun May 20 17:51:50 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src65 appears to have run properly [Mon May 21 00:17:07 2012] Warning, spatial fit 65 centroid is now closest to src. 54 [Mon May 21 00:17:07 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Mon May 21 00:17:07 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Mon May 21 00:17:07 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Mon May 21 00:17:07 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Mon May 21 00:17:07 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon May 21 00:17:07 2012] Source is confused with source 54 [Mon May 21 11:25:33 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Mon May 21 11:25:33 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.39" [Mon May 21 11:25:33 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.059 [Mon May 21 11:25:33 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 58 for pass 1, mean size = 8.39" [Mon May 21 19:23:49 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58.ximg exists [Mon May 21 19:23:49 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58_1.ximg exists [Mon May 21 19:23:49 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src58 appears to have run properly [Mon May 21 19:23:53 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58.ximg exists [Mon May 21 19:23:53 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58_1.ximg exists [Mon May 21 19:23:53 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0202670801_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src58 appears to have run properly [Tue May 22 01:39:48 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 7324.280000, observed total counts = 7324.000000 [Tue May 22 01:39:48 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 55 = 3.248470 pixels [Tue May 22 01:39:48 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 58 to 6 [Tue May 22 01:39:48 2012] 7320.292300 total counts/ 7248.280000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.845842 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 55 = 3.248470 pixels Position = (291.2, 349.0) = 17 45 48.34 -28 58 4.3 Extent = 8.4 (2.1-17.1)" x 6.5 (2.1-15.2)", rotation angle = 339 (296-0) degrees Source counts = 72.0 +/- 85.6 Background counts = 7248.3 Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0007 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability