[Mon Jun 24 14:32:00 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (403.6, 335.2) = 4 7 23.12 -12 9 42.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 117.6 +/- 21.2
  Background counts = 72.8
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Mon Jun 24 14:32:01 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.07'
[Mon Jun 24 17:06:32 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.47 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 24 17:06:32 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.47"
[Mon Jun 24 17:06:32 2013] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.740
[Mon Jun 24 17:06:32 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 21 for pass 0, mean size = 10.47"
[Mon Jun 24 19:16:18 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 24 19:16:18 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 24 19:16:18 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src21 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jun 24 19:16:19 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 24 19:16:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21.csv
[Mon Jun 24 19:16:19 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 24 19:16:19 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21.csv
[Mon Jun 24 19:16:19 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 24 19:16:43 2013] Warning, spatial fit 21 centroid is now closest to src. 6
[Mon Jun 24 19:16:43 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 24 19:16:43 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 24 19:16:43 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 24 19:16:43 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 24 19:16:43 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 24 19:16:43 2013] Source is confused with source 6
[Mon Jun 24 21:21:20 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.47 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 24 21:21:20 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.47"
[Mon Jun 24 21:21:20 2013] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.740
[Mon Jun 24 21:21:20 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 1, mean size = 10.47"
[Mon Jun 24 22:59:37 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 24 22:59:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.csv
[Mon Jun 24 22:59:37 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 24 22:59:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.csv
[Mon Jun 24 22:59:37 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 24 22:59:37 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 24 22:59:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Mon Jun 24 22:59:37 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 24 22:59:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Mon Jun 24 22:59:37 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 24 23:00:03 2013] Warning, spatial fit 20 centroid is now closest to src. 6
[Mon Jun 24 23:00:03 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 24 23:00:03 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 24 23:00:03 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 24 23:00:03 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 24 23:00:03 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 25 02:00:10 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(35060.378143, 29117.018066, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Tue Jun 25 02:00:10 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23_src.reg
[Tue Jun 25 02:00:10 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (366, 298) - (441, 373)
[Tue Jun 25 02:00:10 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(35060.378143, 29117.018066, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(35474.152600, 28800.313000, 566.407216, 340.587210, 65.751400, X, Y)
[Tue Jun 25 02:00:10 2013] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0202210301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23.gif