[Wed Jul 11 05:28:57 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (200.9, 337.6) = 12 42 46.09 33 18 14.7 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 56.8 +/- 11.4 Background counts = 31.8 Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003 [Wed Jul 11 05:28:57 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.62' [Wed Jul 11 09:42:43 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.24 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Jul 11 09:42:43 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.24" [Wed Jul 11 09:42:43 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.798 [Wed Jul 11 09:42:43 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 31 for pass 0, mean size = 10.24" [Wed Jul 11 12:28:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 12:28:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.csv [Wed Jul 11 12:28:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31_1.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 12:28:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.csv [Wed Jul 11 12:28:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jul 11 12:28:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 12:28:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.csv [Wed Jul 11 12:28:42 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31_1.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 12:28:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.csv [Wed Jul 11 12:28:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jul 11 12:29:18 2012] Warning: source 31 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 40 at 12.970979 pixels away [Wed Jul 11 12:29:18 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Jul 11 12:29:18 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Jul 11 12:29:18 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Jul 11 12:29:18 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Jul 11 12:29:18 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Jul 11 17:37:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.24 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Jul 11 17:37:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.24" [Wed Jul 11 17:37:38 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.798 [Wed Jul 11 17:37:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 31 for pass 1, mean size = 10.24" [Wed Jul 11 19:49:53 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src31.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 19:49:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src31.csv [Wed Jul 11 19:49:53 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src31_1.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 19:49:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src31.csv [Wed Jul 11 19:49:53 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src31_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src31.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jul 11 19:49:53 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src31.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 19:49:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src31.csv [Wed Jul 11 19:49:53 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src31_1.ximg exists [Wed Jul 11 19:49:53 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src31.csv [Wed Jul 11 19:49:53 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src31_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0202180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src31.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jul 11 19:50:24 2012] Warning: source 31 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 40 at 14.191521 pixels away [Wed Jul 11 19:50:24 2012] Warning: source 42 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 40 at 10.111893 pixels away [Wed Jul 11 19:50:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Jul 11 19:50:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Jul 11 19:50:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Jul 11 19:50:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Jul 11 19:50:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Jul 11 19:50:24 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9