[Wed May 1 00:51:44 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (305.3, 307.1) = 6 45 16.02 -54 13 31.1 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 162.3 +/- 20.4 Background counts = 79.5 Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.001 [Wed May 1 00:51:44 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.80' [Wed May 1 02:23:24 2013] Using EEF radius (= 6.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed May 1 02:23:24 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.83" [Wed May 1 02:23:24 2013] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.934 [Wed May 1 02:23:24 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 6.83" [Wed May 1 02:50:46 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0201903401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists [Wed May 1 02:50:46 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0201903401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists [Wed May 1 02:50:46 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0201903401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9 appears to have run properly [Wed May 1 02:50:46 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0201903401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Wed May 1 02:50:46 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0201903401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Wed May 1 02:50:46 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0201903401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly [Wed May 1 02:50:57 2013] Source 13 is offset by -5.975892 and -7.149447 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 2.877467 x 0.784943, not incorporating fit results [Wed May 1 02:50:57 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed May 1 02:50:57 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed May 1 02:50:57 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Wed May 1 02:50:57 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Wed May 1 02:50:57 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed May 1 04:20:19 2013] Using EEF radius (= 6.83 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed May 1 04:20:19 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.83" [Wed May 1 04:20:19 2013] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.934 [Wed May 1 04:20:19 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 1, mean size = 6.83" [Wed May 1 04:48:41 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0201903401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg exists [Wed May 1 04:48:41 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0201903401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg exists [Wed May 1 04:48:41 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0201903401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8 appears to have run properly [Wed May 1 04:48:42 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0201903401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists [Wed May 1 04:48:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0201903401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.csv [Wed May 1 04:48:42 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0201903401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists [Wed May 1 04:48:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0201903401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.csv [Wed May 1 04:48:42 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0201903401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0201903401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed May 1 04:48:55 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 997.968000, observed total counts = 998.000000 [Wed May 1 04:48:55 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 0.134377 pixels [Wed May 1 04:48:55 2013] 961.419200 total counts/ 928.238000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.089087 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 0.134377 pixels Position = (305.4, 307.2) = 6 45 15.96 -54 13 30.4 Extent = 3.2 (1.7-5.7)" x 1.8 (1.7-2.9)", rotation angle = 338 (294-0) degrees Source counts = 33.2 +/- 31.0 Background counts = 928.2 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.002 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability