[Tue Jul  3 12:34:43 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (315.0, 323.2) = 14 13 11.54 -3 12 20.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 101.8 +/- 17.8
  Background counts = 13.7
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.001

[Tue Jul  3 12:34:43 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.16'
[Tue Jul  3 13:13:33 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul  3 13:13:33 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.51"
[Tue Jul  3 13:13:33 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.656
[Tue Jul  3 13:13:33 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 7.51"
[Tue Jul  3 13:35:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  3 13:35:39 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Tue Jul  3 13:35:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  3 13:35:39 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Tue Jul  3 13:35:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul  3 13:35:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  3 13:35:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Tue Jul  3 13:35:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  3 13:35:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Tue Jul  3 13:35:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul  3 13:35:45 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = -1691.360000, observed total counts = 3088.000000
[Tue Jul  3 13:35:45 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 11
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jul  3 13:35:45 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul  3 13:35:45 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul  3 13:35:45 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul  3 13:35:45 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul  3 13:35:45 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul  3 13:35:45 2012] Source is confused with source 12
[Tue Jul  3 14:00:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul  3 14:00:47 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.51"
[Tue Jul  3 14:00:47 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.656
[Tue Jul  3 14:00:47 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 1, mean size = 7.51"
[Tue Jul  3 14:04:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  3 14:04:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Tue Jul  3 14:04:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  3 14:04:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Tue Jul  3 14:04:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul  3 14:04:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  3 14:04:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Tue Jul  3 14:04:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  3 14:04:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Tue Jul  3 14:04:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0201830301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul  3 14:04:52 2012] Source 11 is offset by -6.909214 and 0.302488 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.502943 x 6.502943, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jul  3 14:04:52 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul  3 14:04:52 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul  3 14:04:52 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul  3 14:04:52 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul  3 14:04:52 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul  3 14:04:52 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8