[Mon Feb 20 10:33:06 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (302.2, 296.0) = 4 54 4.06 2 56 33.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 296.5 +/- 35.2
  Background counts = 338.6
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.001

[Mon Feb 20 10:33:07 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.33'
[Mon Feb 20 10:38:44 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.59 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Feb 20 10:38:44 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.59"
[Mon Feb 20 10:38:44 2012] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.985
[Mon Feb 20 10:38:44 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 27 for pass 0, mean size = 6.59"
[Mon Feb 20 13:20:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0201510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 13:20:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0201510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv
[Mon Feb 20 13:20:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0201510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 13:20:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0201510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv
[Mon Feb 20 13:20:55 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0201510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0201510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Feb 20 13:20:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0201510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 13:20:56 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0201510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 13:20:56 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0201510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27 appears to have run properly
[Mon Feb 20 19:42:16 2012] Source 28 is offset by -1.006389 and -4.922928 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.154570 x 1.154570, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Feb 20 19:42:17 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Feb 20 19:42:17 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Feb 20 19:42:17 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Feb 20 19:42:17 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Feb 20 19:42:17 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Feb 20 19:42:17 2012] Source is confused with source 14
[Mon Feb 20 19:43:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.59 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Feb 20 19:43:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.59"
[Mon Feb 20 19:43:10 2012] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.985
[Mon Feb 20 19:43:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 26 for pass 1, mean size = 6.59"
[Mon Feb 20 22:34:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0201510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 22:34:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0201510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 22:34:03 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0201510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26 appears to have run properly
[Mon Feb 20 22:34:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0201510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 22:34:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0201510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26_1.ximg exists
[Mon Feb 20 22:34:03 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0201510101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26 appears to have run properly
[Tue Feb 21 04:11:21 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 4808.100000, observed total counts = 4810.000000
[Tue Feb 21 04:11:21 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 0.482720 pixels
[Tue Feb 21 04:11:21 2012] 4630.871800 total counts/ 4609.240000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.318624
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 28 = 0.482720 pixels
  Position = (302.6, 296.3) = 4 54 3.96 2 56 34.7
  Extent = 1.7 (1.6-3.4)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 21.6 +/- 68.1
  Background counts = 4609.2
  Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.002
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability