[Tue Apr 10 15:21:36 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (286.2, 250.7) = 9 22 4.77 50 56 48.2 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 71.6 +/- 14.1 Background counts = 54.5 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004 [Tue Apr 10 15:21:36 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.58' [Tue Apr 10 15:21:55 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.22 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Apr 10 15:21:55 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.22" [Tue Apr 10 15:21:55 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.095 [Tue Apr 10 15:21:55 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 8.22" [Tue Apr 10 15:21:56 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0201440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists [Tue Apr 10 15:21:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0201440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv [Tue Apr 10 15:21:56 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0201440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists [Tue Apr 10 15:21:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0201440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv [Tue Apr 10 15:21:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0201440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0201440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Tue Apr 10 15:21:56 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0201440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists [Tue Apr 10 15:21:56 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0201440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists [Tue Apr 10 15:21:56 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0201440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14 appears to have run properly [Tue Apr 10 15:22:07 2012] Source 15 is offset by -5.983008 and 5.161519 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.531278 x 1.531278, not incorporating fit results [Tue Apr 10 15:22:07 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Tue Apr 10 15:22:07 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Tue Apr 10 15:22:07 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Tue Apr 10 15:22:07 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Tue Apr 10 15:22:07 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Tue Apr 10 15:22:07 2012] Source is confused with source 13 [Tue Apr 10 15:22:20 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.22 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Tue Apr 10 15:22:20 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.22" [Tue Apr 10 15:22:20 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.095 [Tue Apr 10 15:22:20 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 8.22" [Tue Apr 10 15:22:20 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0201440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists [Tue Apr 10 15:22:20 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0201440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists [Tue Apr 10 15:22:20 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0201440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14 appears to have run properly [Tue Apr 10 15:22:20 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0201440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists [Tue Apr 10 15:22:20 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0201440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists [Tue Apr 10 15:22:20 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0201440101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14 appears to have run properly [Tue Apr 10 15:22:31 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 605.522000, observed total counts = 604.000000 [Tue Apr 10 15:22:31 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 15 = 0.198950 pixels [Tue Apr 10 15:22:31 2012] 606.137200 total counts/ 569.323000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.542894 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 15 = 0.198950 pixels Position = (286.2, 250.9) = 9 22 4.77 50 56 48.2 Extent = 3.3 (2.5-4.4)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 36.8 +/- 24.6 Background counts = 569.3 Rate = 0.0009 +/- 0.0006 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability