[Tue Apr 10 16:05:49 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (471.8, 254.1) = 9 55 39.75 69 2 7.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 133.5 +/- 22.6
  Background counts = 64.6
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Tue Apr 10 16:05:51 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.97'
[Tue Apr 10 16:06:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.91 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Apr 10 16:06:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.91"
[Tue Apr 10 16:06:29 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.018
[Tue Apr 10 16:06:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 59 for pass 0, mean size = 12.91"
[Tue Apr 10 16:06:30 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0200980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:06:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0200980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59.csv
[Tue Apr 10 16:06:30 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0200980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:06:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0200980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59.csv
[Tue Apr 10 16:06:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0200980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0200980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src59.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Apr 10 16:06:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0200980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src59.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:06:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0200980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src59_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:06:31 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0200980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src59 appears to have run properly
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:00 2012] Warning: source 59 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 33 at 12.876872 pixels away
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:00 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1235.520000, observed total counts = 1234.000000
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:00 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 33 = 0.869095 pixels
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:00 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 59 to 70
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:00 2012] 1224.882100 total counts/ 1129.510000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.837764
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 33 = 0.869095 pixels
  Position = (472.1, 253.2) = 9 55 39.52 69 2 6.4
  Extent = 9.0 (3.5-14.4)" x 4.3 (3.2-6.5)", rotation angle = 356 (349-0) degrees
  Source counts = 95.4 +/- 35.0
  Background counts = 1129.5
  Rate = 0.0009 +/- 0.0003
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:00 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:00 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:00 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:00 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:00 2012] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 0.54
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:00 2012] Source is confused with source 36
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:21 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:21 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.63"
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:21 2012] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.976
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:21 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 57 for pass 1, mean size = 6.63"
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:22 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0200980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0200980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.csv
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:22 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0200980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0200980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.csv
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0200980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0200980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0200980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0200980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:23 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0200980101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57 appears to have run properly
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:48 2012] Warning, spatial fit 57 centroid is now closest to src. 36
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:48 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1230.580000, observed total counts = 1234.000000
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:48 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 33 = 0.801049 pixels
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:48 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 57 to 66
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:48 2012] 1224.944500 total counts/ 1153.950000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.089927
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 33 = 0.801049 pixels
  Position = (471.3, 253.2) = 9 55 40.17 69 2 6.3
  Extent = 4.7 (3.3-7.6)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 71.0 +/- 35.0
  Background counts = 1154.0
  Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0003
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:48 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:48 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:48 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:48 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:48 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Apr 10 16:07:48 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9