[Fri Sep 23 10:17:24 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (200.8, 397.5) = 20 20 55.52 -52 30 56.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 29.6 +/- 7.4
  Background counts = 5.3
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006

[Fri Sep 23 10:17:24 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.08'
[Fri Sep 23 11:37:29 2011] Using EEF radius (= 11.47 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Sep 23 11:37:29 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.47"
[Fri Sep 23 11:37:29 2011] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.067
[Fri Sep 23 11:37:29 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 24 for pass 0, mean size = 11.47"
[Fri Sep 23 12:17:08 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0200430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 12:17:08 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0200430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.csv
[Fri Sep 23 12:17:08 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0200430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 12:17:08 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0200430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.csv
[Fri Sep 23 12:17:08 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0200430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0200430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Sep 23 12:17:09 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0200430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 12:17:09 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0200430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 12:17:09 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0200430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24 appears to have run properly
[Fri Sep 23 12:17:15 2011] Warning, spatial fit 11 centroid is now closest to src. 9
[Fri Sep 23 12:17:18 2011] Warning, spatial fit 8 centroid is now closest to src. 1
[Fri Sep 23 12:17:22 2011] Warning, spatial fit 5 centroid is now closest to src. 15
[Fri Sep 23 12:17:22 2011] Warning, spatial fit 15 centroid is now closest to src. 14
[Fri Sep 23 12:17:22 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 67.702600, observed total counts = 68.000000
[Fri Sep 23 12:17:22 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.332520 pixels
[Fri Sep 23 12:17:22 2011] 69.372400 total counts/ 45.077800 bgd. counts: snr = 3.618498
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.332520 pixels
  Position = (200.8, 397.2) = 20 20 55.55 -52 30 59.3
  Extent = 6.3 (2.9-9.9)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 24.3 +/- 8.3
  Background counts = 45.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0007
[Fri Sep 23 12:17:22 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Sep 23 12:17:22 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Sep 23 12:17:22 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Sep 23 12:17:22 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Sep 23 12:17:22 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Sep 23 13:27:27 2011] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Sep 23 13:27:27 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.34"
[Fri Sep 23 13:27:27 2011] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 15, mask sum = 16, frac = 1.045
[Fri Sep 23 13:27:27 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 1, mean size = 6.34"
[Fri Sep 23 13:57:36 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0200430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 13:57:36 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0200430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv
[Fri Sep 23 13:57:36 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0200430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 13:57:36 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0200430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.csv
[Fri Sep 23 13:57:36 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0200430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0200430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Sep 23 13:57:36 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0200430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 13:57:36 2011] fullrun_mos2_xmm0200430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep 23 13:57:36 2011] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0200430601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22 appears to have run properly
[Fri Sep 23 13:57:40 2011] Warning, spatial fit 12 centroid is now closest to src. 24
[Fri Sep 23 13:57:44 2011] Warning, spatial fit 7 centroid is now closest to src. 14
[Fri Sep 23 13:57:44 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 68.997200, observed total counts = 69.000000
[Fri Sep 23 13:57:44 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.364892 pixels
[Fri Sep 23 13:57:44 2011] 69.928000 total counts/ 51.125900 bgd. counts: snr = 2.629577
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.364892 pixels
  Position = (200.9, 397.6) = 20 20 55.50 -52 30 57.8
  Extent = 4.6 (1.6-9.4)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 18.8 +/- 8.4
  Background counts = 51.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0007
[Fri Sep 23 13:57:44 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Sep 23 13:57:44 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Sep 23 13:57:44 2011] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri Sep 23 13:57:44 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Sep 23 13:57:44 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Sep 23 13:57:44 2011] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9