[Sun Jun 10 17:09:19 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (318.8, 226.2) = 3 30 40.68 -3 14 27.2 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 40.2 +/- 8.1 Background counts = 8.9 Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0008 [Sun Jun 10 17:09:19 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.44' [Sun Jun 10 17:10:41 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.15 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jun 10 17:10:41 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.15" [Sun Jun 10 17:10:41 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.590 [Sun Jun 10 17:10:41 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 0, mean size = 9.15" [Sun Jun 10 17:45:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 17:45:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.csv [Sun Jun 10 17:45:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 17:45:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.csv [Sun Jun 10 17:45:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 10 17:45:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 17:45:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.csv [Sun Jun 10 17:45:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 17:45:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.csv [Sun Jun 10 17:45:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 10 18:24:30 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 217.928000, observed total counts = 109.000000 [Sun Jun 10 18:24:30 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 20 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sun Jun 10 18:24:30 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Jun 10 18:24:30 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Jun 10 18:24:30 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Jun 10 18:24:30 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Jun 10 18:24:30 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Jun 10 18:24:40 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.15 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jun 10 18:24:40 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.15" [Sun Jun 10 18:24:40 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.590 [Sun Jun 10 18:24:40 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 1, mean size = 9.15" [Sun Jun 10 18:54:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 18:54:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv [Sun Jun 10 18:54:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 18:54:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv [Sun Jun 10 18:54:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 10 18:54:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 18:54:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv [Sun Jun 10 18:54:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 18:54:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.csv [Sun Jun 10 18:54:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 10 19:27:54 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 179.238000, observed total counts = 109.000000 [Sun Jun 10 19:27:54 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 20 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sun Jun 10 19:27:54 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Jun 10 19:27:54 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Jun 10 19:27:54 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Jun 10 19:27:54 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Jun 10 19:27:54 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Jun 10 19:28:03 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(27690.507996, 19635.034943, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sun Jun 10 19:28:03 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src20_src.reg [Sun Jun 10 19:28:03 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (281, 189) - (356, 264) [Sun Jun 10 19:28:03 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(27690.507996, 19635.034943, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) [Sun Jun 10 19:28:03 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src20.gif