[Sun Jun 10 17:09:37 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (307.1, 398.1) = 3 30 44.10 -3 2 4.1 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 75.4 +/- 12.5 Background counts = 3.0 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002 [Sun Jun 10 17:09:38 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.26' [Sun Jun 10 17:45:33 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.06 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jun 10 17:45:33 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass [Sun Jun 10 17:45:33 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.06" [Sun Jun 10 17:45:33 2012] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 31, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.727 [Sun Jun 10 17:45:33 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 10.06" [Sun Jun 10 18:04:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 18:04:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 18:04:52 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3 appears to have run properly [Sun Jun 10 18:04:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 18:04:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv [Sun Jun 10 18:04:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 10 18:04:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv [Sun Jun 10 18:04:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0200430401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 10 18:24:32 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 81.904200, observed total counts = 90.000000 [Sun Jun 10 18:24:32 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 1.583346 pixels [Sun Jun 10 18:24:32 2012] 81.804700 total counts/ 37.931600 bgd. counts: snr = 7.123571 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 1.583346 pixels Position = (307.1, 396.6) = 3 30 44.09 -3 2 4.0 Extent = 6.7" x 4.5", rotation angle = 350 Source counts = 43.9 +/- 9.0 Background counts = 37.9 Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0008 [Sun Jun 10 18:24:32 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Jun 10 18:24:32 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Jun 10 18:24:32 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Jun 10 18:24:32 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Jun 10 18:24:32 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.47 [Sun Jun 10 18:54:30 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jun 10 18:54:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 5.61" [Sun Jun 10 18:54:30 2012] source mask rpix=1.3, npix_max = 12, mask sum = 3, frac = 0.234 [Sun Jun 10 18:54:30 2012] Skipping simple spatial due to low active detector fraction [Sun Jun 10 19:27:55 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Jun 10 19:27:55 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Jun 10 19:27:55 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Jun 10 19:27:55 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Jun 10 19:27:55 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.47