[Sun May 20 01:18:33 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (287.9, 324.1) = 18 56 33.62 -37 51 25.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 106.7 +/- 21.0
  Background counts = 135.7
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Sun May 20 01:18:33 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.01'
[Sun May 20 01:35:49 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.43 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 20 01:35:49 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.43"
[Sun May 20 01:35:49 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.820
[Sun May 20 01:35:49 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 0, mean size = 7.43"
[Sun May 20 01:56:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 01:56:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Sun May 20 01:56:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 01:56:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.csv
[Sun May 20 01:56:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 01:56:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 01:56:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sun May 20 01:56:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 01:56:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sun May 20 01:56:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 03:30:26 2012] Warning, spatial fit 2 centroid is now closest to src. 1
[Sun May 20 03:30:26 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 20 03:30:26 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 20 03:30:26 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 20 03:30:26 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 20 03:30:26 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 20 03:30:26 2012] Source is confused with source 1
[Sun May 20 03:30:44 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.43 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 20 03:30:44 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.43"
[Sun May 20 03:30:44 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.820
[Sun May 20 03:30:44 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 2 for pass 1, mean size = 7.43"
[Sun May 20 03:49:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 03:49:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Sun May 20 03:49:04 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 03:49:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.csv
[Sun May 20 03:49:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 03:49:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 03:49:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sun May 20 03:49:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 20 03:49:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.csv
[Sun May 20 03:49:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0165972101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src2.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 20 05:00:43 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1927.890000, observed total counts = 1138.000000
[Sun May 20 05:00:43 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 2
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun May 20 05:00:43 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1920.810000, observed total counts = 1590.000000
[Sun May 20 05:00:43 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 2
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun May 20 05:00:43 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 20 05:00:43 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 20 05:00:43 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 20 05:00:43 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 20 05:00:43 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 20 05:00:43 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9