[Fri Mar 23 10:34:03 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (452.1, 260.3) = 18 55 44.81 -37 58 36.8 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 53.2 +/- 10.9 Background counts = 16.5 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006 [Fri Mar 23 10:34:03 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.48' [Fri Mar 23 12:51:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.17 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Mar 23 12:51:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.17" [Fri Mar 23 12:51:38 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.966 [Fri Mar 23 12:51:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 12.17" [Fri Mar 23 13:51:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0165972001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists [Fri Mar 23 13:51:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0165972001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Fri Mar 23 13:51:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0165972001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists [Fri Mar 23 13:51:38 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0165972001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Fri Mar 23 13:51:38 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0165972001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0165972001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Mar 23 13:51:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0165972001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Fri Mar 23 13:51:38 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0165972001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Fri Mar 23 13:51:38 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0165972001_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly [Fri Mar 23 13:51:53 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 20 at 10.655130 pixels away [Fri Mar 23 13:51:53 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Mar 23 13:51:53 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Mar 23 13:51:53 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Mar 23 13:51:53 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Mar 23 13:51:53 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Mar 23 14:20:44 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.17 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Mar 23 14:20:44 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.17" [Fri Mar 23 14:20:44 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.966 [Fri Mar 23 14:20:44 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 12.17" [Fri Mar 23 15:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0165972001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists [Fri Mar 23 15:25:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0165972001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Fri Mar 23 15:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0165972001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists [Fri Mar 23 15:25:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0165972001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Fri Mar 23 15:25:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0165972001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0165972001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Mar 23 15:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0165972001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Fri Mar 23 15:25:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0165972001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Fri Mar 23 15:25:23 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0165972001_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly [Fri Mar 23 15:25:36 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 245.992000, observed total counts = 246.000000 [Fri Mar 23 15:25:36 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 20 = 0.257817 pixels [Fri Mar 23 15:25:36 2012] 247.303300 total counts/ 215.933000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.134810 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 20 = 0.257817 pixels Position = (451.8, 260.3) = 18 55 44.90 -37 58 37.2 Extent = 5.4 (3.0-10.1)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 31.4 +/- 15.7 Background counts = 215.9 Rate = 0.0009 +/- 0.0005 [Fri Mar 23 15:25:36 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Mar 23 15:25:36 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Mar 23 15:25:36 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Fri Mar 23 15:25:36 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Mar 23 15:25:36 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri Mar 23 15:25:36 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9