[Wed Mar 7 11:08:38 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (411.5, 310.5) = 7 19 46.34 -31 26 38.0 Extent = 21.7" x 21.7", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 49.7 +/- 14.5 Background counts = 474.4 Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003 [Wed Mar 7 11:08:39 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.24' [Wed Mar 7 17:54:37 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.55 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Mar 7 17:54:37 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.55" [Wed Mar 7 17:54:37 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.643 [Wed Mar 7 17:54:37 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 10.55" [Wed Mar 7 18:22:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 18:22:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv [Wed Mar 7 18:22:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 18:22:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv [Wed Mar 7 18:22:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Mar 7 18:22:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 18:22:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv [Wed Mar 7 18:22:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 18:22:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv [Wed Mar 7 18:22:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Mar 7 18:38:20 2012] Warning, spatial fit 13 centroid is now closest to src. 14 [Wed Mar 7 18:38:20 2012] Warning, spatial fit 14 centroid is now closest to src. 11 [Wed Mar 7 18:38:20 2012] Warning, spatial fit 20 centroid is now closest to src. 19 [Wed Mar 7 18:38:20 2012] Warning, spatial fit 26 centroid is now closest to src. 23 [Wed Mar 7 18:38:20 2012] Warning, spatial fit 46 centroid is now closest to src. 15 [Wed Mar 7 18:38:24 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 101.529000, observed total counts = 90.000000 [Wed Mar 7 18:38:24 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 12 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Wed Mar 7 18:38:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Mar 7 18:38:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Mar 7 18:38:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Mar 7 18:38:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Mar 7 18:38:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Mar 7 18:38:24 2012] Source is confused with source 13 [Wed Mar 7 21:31:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.55 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Mar 7 21:31:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.55" [Wed Mar 7 21:31:45 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.643 [Wed Mar 7 21:31:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 10 for pass 1, mean size = 10.55" [Wed Mar 7 21:56:42 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 21:56:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv [Wed Mar 7 21:56:42 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 21:56:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.csv [Wed Mar 7 21:56:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Mar 7 21:56:43 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 21:56:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv [Wed Mar 7 21:56:43 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg exists [Wed Mar 7 21:56:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.csv [Wed Mar 7 21:56:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0164560501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src10.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Mar 7 22:11:53 2012] Warning, spatial fit 10 centroid is now closest to src. 11 [Wed Mar 7 22:11:53 2012] Warning, spatial fit 23 centroid is now closest to src. 4 [Wed Mar 7 22:11:53 2012] Warning, spatial fit 40 centroid is now closest to src. 45 [Wed Mar 7 22:11:55 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 100.438000, observed total counts = 90.000000 [Wed Mar 7 22:11:55 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 12 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Wed Mar 7 22:11:55 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Mar 7 22:11:55 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Mar 7 22:11:55 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Mar 7 22:11:55 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Mar 7 22:11:55 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Mar 7 22:11:55 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9