[Sat Jun 1 01:20:36 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (291.0, 394.1) = 16 57 51.07 35 29 25.0 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 88.1 +/- 16.7 Background counts = 78.9 Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.005 [Sat Jun 1 01:20:41 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.96' [Sat Jun 1 01:27:03 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.91 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jun 1 01:27:03 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.91" [Sat Jun 1 01:27:03 2013] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.167 [Sat Jun 1 01:27:03 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 0, mean size = 9.91" [Sat Jun 1 09:21:53 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg exists [Sat Jun 1 09:21:53 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv [Sat Jun 1 09:21:53 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 1 09:21:53 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv [Sat Jun 1 09:21:53 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jun 1 09:21:55 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists [Sat Jun 1 09:21:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv [Sat Jun 1 09:21:55 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 1 09:21:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.csv [Sat Jun 1 09:21:55 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jun 1 09:49:33 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 709.986000, observed total counts = 522.000000 [Sat Jun 1 09:49:33 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sat Jun 1 09:49:33 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 623.704000, observed total counts = 495.000000 [Sat Jun 1 09:49:33 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sat Jun 1 09:49:34 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Jun 1 09:49:34 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Jun 1 09:49:34 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Jun 1 09:49:34 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Jun 1 09:49:34 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Jun 1 09:49:34 2013] Source is confused with source 12 [Sat Jun 1 09:49:54 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.91 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jun 1 09:49:54 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.91" [Sat Jun 1 09:49:54 2013] source mask rpix=2.3, npix_max = 30, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.167 [Sat Jun 1 09:49:54 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 1, mean size = 9.91" [Sat Jun 1 15:56:50 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg exists [Sat Jun 1 15:56:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.csv [Sat Jun 1 15:56:50 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 1 15:56:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.csv [Sat Jun 1 15:56:50 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jun 1 15:56:52 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists [Sat Jun 1 15:56:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.csv [Sat Jun 1 15:56:52 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 1 15:56:52 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.csv [Sat Jun 1 15:56:52 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jun 1 16:23:17 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 710.896000, observed total counts = 522.000000 [Sat Jun 1 16:23:17 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sat Jun 1 16:23:17 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 622.477000, observed total counts = 495.000000 [Sat Jun 1 16:23:17 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sat Jun 1 16:23:17 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Jun 1 16:23:17 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Jun 1 16:23:17 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Jun 1 16:23:17 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Jun 1 16:23:17 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Jun 1 16:23:37 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(25265.550262, 34237.183655, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sat Jun 1 16:23:37 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src.reg [Sat Jun 1 16:23:37 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (253, 357) - (328, 432) [Sat Jun 1 16:23:37 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(25265.550262, 34237.183655, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23940.579132, 37095.089050, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24672.836212, 35789.961609, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24393.304108, 35441.013763, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24198.963928, 35035.203156, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24457.770874, 34387.423798, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25180.504364, 33788.337677, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25103.991730, 33023.362671, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25937.700134, 32479.679047, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25261.161499, 32325.700623, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sat Jun 1 16:23:37 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9.gif [Sat Jun 1 16:30:25 2013] Mean detx,y = (-3122.45, 9544.77) [Sat Jun 1 16:30:29 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Sat Jun 1 16:30:45 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Sat Jun 1 16:30:45 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src_b10.pi.gz [Sat Jun 1 16:30:45 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_bgd.pi.gz [Sat Jun 1 17:14:22 2013] Not generating rmf since there are only 88 counts [Sat Jun 1 17:14:22 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Sat Jun 1 18:44:27 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Sat Jun 1 18:44:27 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_src_b10.pi.gz = 264.00 [Sat Jun 1 18:44:27 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_bgd.pi.gz = 1012.00 [Sat Jun 1 18:44:27 2013] Got source and background scale factors 1184522.000000, 5238737.000000 [Sat Jun 1 18:44:27 2013] User source parameters: Position = (291.0, 394.1) = 16 57 51.07 35 29 25.0 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 Source aperture counts = 35.2 +/- 17.3 Background aperture counts = 228.8 Rate = 0.07 +/- 0.04 [Sat Jun 1 18:44:27 2013] Updating counts from extracted products [Sat Jun 1 18:44:27 2013] Set source signif. to 35.18/15.13 = 2.33 [Sat Jun 1 18:44:50 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Sat Jun 1 18:44:50 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0729, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9.arf [Sat Jun 1 18:44:50 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Sat Jun 1 18:44:50 2013] Updating source flux to 3.6e-13 [Sat Jun 1 18:45:01 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting [Sat Jun 1 18:45:02 2013] xmm0163960301/analysis//spectral/fullrun_pn_xmm0163960301_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src9_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete