[Fri May 25 12:58:03 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (315.4, 385.1) = 12 36 39.60 62 21 13.5 Extent = 21.7" x 21.7", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 52.3 +/- 14.7 Background counts = 466.6 Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001 [Fri May 25 12:58:03 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.40' [Fri May 25 12:59:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.63 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri May 25 12:59:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.63" [Fri May 25 12:59:29 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 27, frac = 0.917 [Fri May 25 12:59:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 71 for pass 0, mean size = 9.63" [Fri May 25 17:12:11 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0162160601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71.ximg exists [Fri May 25 17:12:11 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0162160601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71_1.ximg exists [Fri May 25 17:12:11 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0162160601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src71 appears to have run properly [Fri May 25 17:12:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0162160601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71.ximg exists [Fri May 25 17:12:13 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0162160601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71_1.ximg exists [Fri May 25 17:12:13 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0162160601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src71 appears to have run properly [Fri May 25 17:12:26 2012] Warning: source 71 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 71 at 10.947206 pixels away [Fri May 25 17:12:26 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri May 25 17:12:26 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri May 25 17:12:26 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri May 25 17:12:26 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri May 25 17:12:26 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri May 25 17:12:32 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.63 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri May 25 17:12:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.63" [Fri May 25 17:12:32 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 27, frac = 0.917 [Fri May 25 17:12:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 62 for pass 1, mean size = 9.63" [Fri May 25 21:20:56 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0162160601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src62.ximg exists [Fri May 25 21:20:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0162160601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src62.csv [Fri May 25 21:20:56 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0162160601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src62_1.ximg exists [Fri May 25 21:20:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0162160601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src62.csv [Fri May 25 21:20:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0162160601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src62_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0162160601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src62.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 25 21:20:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0162160601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src62.ximg exists [Fri May 25 21:20:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0162160601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src62_1.ximg exists [Fri May 25 21:20:58 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0162160601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src62 appears to have run properly [Fri May 25 21:21:16 2012] Source 71 is offset by 5.579198 and 7.912102 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.772030 x 1.772030, not incorporating fit results [Fri May 25 21:21:16 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri May 25 21:21:16 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri May 25 21:21:16 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri May 25 21:21:16 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri May 25 21:21:16 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri May 25 21:21:16 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9