[Fri Feb 17 10:36:43 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (319.6, 304.0) = 7 48 15.07 -67 43 1.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 92.9 +/- 22.0
  Background counts = 128.3
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003

[Fri Feb 17 10:36:45 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.59'
[Fri Feb 17 12:38:08 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.22 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Feb 17 12:38:08 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.22"
[Fri Feb 17 12:38:08 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.071
[Fri Feb 17 12:38:08 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 56 for pass 0, mean size = 7.22"
[Fri Feb 17 23:58:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160761301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 17 23:58:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0160761301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56.csv
[Fri Feb 17 23:58:31 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160761301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56_1.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 17 23:58:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0160761301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56.csv
[Fri Feb 17 23:58:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0160761301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0160761301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src56.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Feb 17 23:58:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160761301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 17 23:58:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160761301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56_1.ximg exists
[Fri Feb 17 23:58:32 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0160761301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src56 appears to have run properly
[Fri Feb 17 23:58:49 2012] Source 36 is offset by -5.596569 and -7.232478 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.642299 x 6.642299, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Feb 17 23:58:49 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Feb 17 23:58:49 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Feb 17 23:58:49 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Feb 17 23:58:49 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Feb 17 23:58:49 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Feb 17 23:58:49 2012] Source is confused with source 42
[Sat Feb 18 02:35:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.22 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Feb 18 02:35:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.22"
[Sat Feb 18 02:35:31 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 20, frac = 1.071
[Sat Feb 18 02:35:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 50 for pass 1, mean size = 7.22"
[Sat Feb 18 13:04:44 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160761301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src50.ximg exists
[Sat Feb 18 13:04:44 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160761301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src50_1.ximg exists
[Sat Feb 18 13:04:44 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0160761301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src50 appears to have run properly
[Sat Feb 18 13:04:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160761301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src50.ximg exists
[Sat Feb 18 13:04:45 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160761301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src50_1.ximg exists
[Sat Feb 18 13:04:45 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0160761301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src50 appears to have run properly
[Sat Feb 18 13:05:02 2012] Source 36 is offset by -5.995052 and -7.595029 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.642299 x 6.642299, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Feb 18 13:05:02 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Feb 18 13:05:02 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Feb 18 13:05:02 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Feb 18 13:05:02 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Feb 18 13:05:02 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Feb 18 13:05:02 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9