[Thu Mar 15 00:55:03 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (288.0, 239.0) = 7 48 32.31 -67 47 52.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 99.9 +/- 18.7
  Background counts = 75.8
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Thu Mar 15 00:55:03 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.37'
[Thu Mar 15 01:52:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.61 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Mar 15 01:52:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.61"
[Thu Mar 15 01:52:31 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.016
[Thu Mar 15 01:52:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 34 for pass 0, mean size = 8.61"
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:14 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.csv
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:14 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.csv
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:14 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src34.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.csv
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.csv
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src34.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:29 2012] Source 44 is offset by 8.124048 and -3.049905 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.374023 x 2.374023, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:29 2012] Warning, spatial fit 34 centroid is now closest to src. 45
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:29 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:29 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:29 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:29 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:29 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:29 2012] Source is confused with source 45
[Thu Mar 15 06:58:11 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.61 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Mar 15 06:58:11 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.61"
[Thu Mar 15 06:58:11 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.016
[Thu Mar 15 06:58:11 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 1, mean size = 8.61"
[Thu Mar 15 11:47:51 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 15 11:47:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.csv
[Thu Mar 15 11:47:51 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 15 11:47:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.csv
[Thu Mar 15 11:47:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar 15 11:47:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 15 11:47:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.csv
[Thu Mar 15 11:47:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 15 11:47:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.csv
[Thu Mar 15 11:47:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar 15 11:48:10 2012] Warning: source 20 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 44 at 10.507231 pixels away
[Thu Mar 15 11:48:10 2012] Warning, spatial fit 28 centroid is now closest to src. 46
[Thu Mar 15 11:48:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Mar 15 11:48:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Mar 15 11:48:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Mar 15 11:48:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Mar 15 11:48:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Mar 15 11:48:10 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9