[Thu Mar 15 00:55:03 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (280.8, 314.1) = 7 48 37.78 -67 42 28.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 104.1 +/- 20.5
  Background counts = 96.6
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Thu Mar 15 00:55:03 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.71'
[Thu Mar 15 01:52:31 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.28 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Mar 15 01:52:31 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.28"
[Thu Mar 15 01:52:31 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.635
[Thu Mar 15 01:52:31 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 36 for pass 0, mean size = 7.28"
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:14 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src36.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src36.csv
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:14 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src36_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:14 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src36.csv
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:14 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src36_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src36.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src36.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:15 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src36_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:15 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src36 appears to have run properly
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:29 2012] Warning, spatial fit 36 centroid is now closest to src. 32
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:29 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:29 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:29 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:29 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:29 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Mar 15 06:24:29 2012] Source is confused with source 29
[Thu Mar 15 06:58:11 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.28 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Mar 15 06:58:11 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.28"
[Thu Mar 15 06:58:11 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.635
[Thu Mar 15 06:58:11 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 29 for pass 1, mean size = 7.28"
[Thu Mar 15 11:47:51 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src29.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 15 11:47:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src29.csv
[Thu Mar 15 11:47:51 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src29_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 15 11:47:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src29.csv
[Thu Mar 15 11:47:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src29_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src29.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar 15 11:47:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 15 11:47:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29.csv
[Thu Mar 15 11:47:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29_1.ximg exists
[Thu Mar 15 11:47:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29.csv
[Thu Mar 15 11:47:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0160760601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src29.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Mar 15 11:48:10 2012] Warning: source 18 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 33 at 11.856539 pixels away
[Thu Mar 15 11:48:10 2012] Warning, spatial fit 29 centroid is now closest to src. 29
[Thu Mar 15 11:48:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Mar 15 11:48:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Mar 15 11:48:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Mar 15 11:48:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Mar 15 11:48:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Mar 15 11:48:10 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9