[Tue Mar 13 17:49:13 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (262.0, 128.5) = 21 59 10.70 -30 26 47.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 45.7 +/- 9.3
  Background counts = 6.8
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Tue Mar 13 17:49:13 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.60'
[Tue Mar 13 18:15:44 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.73 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar 13 18:15:44 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.73"
[Tue Mar 13 18:15:44 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.894
[Tue Mar 13 18:15:44 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 12.73"
[Tue Mar 13 18:44:49 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0158960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 13 18:44:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0158960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Tue Mar 13 18:44:49 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0158960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 13 18:44:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0158960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Tue Mar 13 18:44:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0158960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0158960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 13 18:44:49 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0158960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 13 18:44:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0158960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Mar 13 18:44:49 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0158960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 13 18:44:49 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0158960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Tue Mar 13 18:44:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0158960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0158960101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 13 19:16:30 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 12 at 16.944136 pixels away
[Tue Mar 13 19:16:30 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Mar 13 19:16:30 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Mar 13 19:16:30 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Mar 13 19:16:30 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Mar 13 19:16:30 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Mar 13 19:16:30 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.7