[Tue Apr 10 16:13:45 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (453.9, 283.1) = 1 35 42.91 15 43 5.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 42.6 +/- 8.7
  Background counts = 5.8
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006

[Tue Apr 10 16:13:45 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.32'
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.09 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.09"
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:04 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.837
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 0, mean size = 12.09"
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:04 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0154350201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0154350201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:04 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0154350201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:04 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0154350201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.csv
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:04 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0154350201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0154350201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:04 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0154350201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:04 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0154350201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:04 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0154350201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src11 appears to have run properly
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:14 2012] Warning: source 11 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 10 at 11.298665 pixels away
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:14 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:14 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:14 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:14 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:14 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:28 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.09 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:28 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.09"
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:28 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.837
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:28 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 1, mean size = 12.09"
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:29 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0154350201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:29 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0154350201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:29 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0154350201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11 appears to have run properly
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:29 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0154350201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:29 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0154350201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:29 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0154350201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11 appears to have run properly
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:39 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 118.979000, observed total counts = 119.000000
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:39 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 0.554325 pixels
[Tue Apr 10 16:14:39 2012] 117.634900 total counts/ 100.953000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.660297
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 0.554325 pixels
  Position = (453.5, 282.7) = 1 35 43.03 15 43 4.7
  Extent = 3.3" x 1.2", rotation angle = 347
  Source counts = 16.7 +/- 10.8
  Background counts = 101.0
  Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0004
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability