[Wed May  1 00:46:38 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (322.9, 195.6) = 16 22 28.87 -15 51 18.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 259.5 +/- 20.7
  Background counts = 17.0
  Rate = 0.1 +/- 0.008

[Wed May  1 00:46:38 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.67'
[Thu May  2 00:00:09 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May  2 00:00:09 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.26"
[Thu May  2 00:00:09 2013] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 28, frac = 0.856
[Thu May  2 00:00:09 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 91 for pass 0, mean size = 10.26"
[Thu May  2 06:58:23 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg exists
[Thu May  2 06:58:23 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv
[Thu May  2 06:58:23 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  2 06:58:23 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv
[Thu May  2 06:58:23 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May  2 06:58:26 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.ximg exists
[Thu May  2 06:58:26 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.csv
[Thu May  2 06:58:26 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg exists
[Thu May  2 06:58:26 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.csv
[Thu May  2 06:58:26 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May  2 06:59:38 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1322.010000, observed total counts = 1000.000000
[Thu May  2 06:59:38 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 169
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu May  2 06:59:38 2013] Warning, spatial fit 91 centroid is now closest to src. 59
[Thu May  2 06:59:38 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May  2 06:59:38 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May  2 06:59:38 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May  2 06:59:38 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May  2 06:59:38 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May  2 06:59:38 2013] Source is confused with source 167
[Fri May  3 05:32:07 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.26 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May  3 05:32:07 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.26"
[Fri May  3 05:32:07 2013] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 28, frac = 0.856
[Fri May  3 05:32:07 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 91 for pass 1, mean size = 10.26"
[Fri May  3 12:59:40 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src91.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 12:59:40 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src91.csv
[Fri May  3 12:59:40 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src91_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 12:59:40 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src91.csv
[Fri May  3 12:59:40 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src91_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  3 12:59:42 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src91.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 12:59:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src91.csv
[Fri May  3 12:59:42 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 12:59:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src91.csv
[Fri May  3 12:59:42 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  3 13:00:57 2013] Warning, spatial fit 91 centroid is now closest to src. 166
[Fri May  3 13:00:57 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May  3 13:00:57 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May  3 13:00:57 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May  3 13:00:57 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May  3 13:00:57 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May  3 15:27:56 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(28047.261627, 16965.845047, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri May  3 15:27:56 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src169_src.reg
[Fri May  3 15:27:56 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (285, 158) - (360, 233)
[Fri May  3 15:27:56 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(28047.261627, 16965.845047, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30253.802000, 16963.570000, 1667.504048, 590.900817, 226.701000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29435.350769, 17948.722290, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30027.900208, 17258.633713, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28414.429200, 19493.211000, 1731.760050, 240.056807, 57.616600, X, Y) && !ellipse(28918.504181, 18745.314713, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28008.426200, 20193.685200, 1432.160041, 277.905608, 62.261000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31788.711000, 19529.419000, 1616.000046, 202.000006, 52.254100, X, Y) && !ellipse(31318.398000, 15958.842000, 1842.568053, 230.321607, 46.548900, X, Y) && !ellipse(31435.026640, 20011.096800, 1767.600051, 220.949606, 54.417900, X, Y) && !ellipse(31004.706400, 20650.435600, 1719.944049, 214.992806, 57.446800, X, Y) && !ellipse(31489.216200, 13094.156800, 1960.032056, 548.315216, 39.176100, X, Y) && !ellipse(29242.258400, 20480.807700, 1458.656042, 182.332005, 60.314000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27948.141418, 17640.967224, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30432.228000, 13932.822000, 1994.976057, 1994.976057, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30145.377289, 19095.055084, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27358.754120, 18337.904449, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29542.157288, 19963.706329, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29832.017456, 19604.734421, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28576.446136, 17006.863922, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30694.878082, 18273.607605, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26528.637970, 19334.802902, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28319.460541, 16328.942017, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25538.691711, 19969.503586, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri May  3 15:27:56 2013] Writing fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src169.gif
[Fri May  3 17:54:44 2013] Mean detx,y = (1682.01, 7470.20) 
[Fri May  3 17:54:46 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Fri May  3 17:55:05 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Fri May  3 17:55:06 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src169_src_b10.pi.gz
[Fri May  3 17:55:06 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950901_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src169_bgd.pi.gz
[Fri May  3 21:29:21 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Fri May  3 21:29:21 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts