[Sun May 27 11:30:56 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (369.3, 292.1) = 11 4 16.58 38 10 50.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 59.6 +/- 12.6
  Background counts = 22.6
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0008

[Sun May 27 11:30:57 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.16'
[Sun May 27 15:07:36 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 27 15:07:36 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.01"
[Sun May 27 15:07:36 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.946
[Sun May 27 15:07:36 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 39 for pass 0, mean size = 9.01"
[Sun May 27 18:50:11 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39.ximg exists
[Sun May 27 18:50:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39.csv
[Sun May 27 18:50:11 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 27 18:50:11 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39.csv
[Sun May 27 18:50:11 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src39.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 27 18:50:12 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src39.ximg exists
[Sun May 27 18:50:12 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src39_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 27 18:50:12 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src39 appears to have run properly
[Sun May 27 18:50:40 2012] Warning, spatial fit 39 centroid is now closest to src. 59
[Sun May 27 18:50:40 2012] Source 60 is offset by -8.257588 and 0.980427 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.936258 x 1.936258, not incorporating fit results
[Sun May 27 18:50:40 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 27 18:50:40 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 27 18:50:40 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 27 18:50:40 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 27 18:50:40 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 27 18:50:40 2012] Source is confused with source 59
[Sun May 27 21:19:35 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 27 21:19:35 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.01"
[Sun May 27 21:19:35 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.946
[Sun May 27 21:19:35 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 33 for pass 1, mean size = 9.01"
[Sun May 27 23:58:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33.ximg exists
[Sun May 27 23:58:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 27 23:58:32 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33 appears to have run properly
[Sun May 27 23:58:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33.ximg exists
[Sun May 27 23:58:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 27 23:58:32 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0153950701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33 appears to have run properly
[Sun May 27 23:58:43 2012] Warning, spatial fit 33 centroid is now closest to src. 59
[Sun May 27 23:58:43 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 27 23:58:43 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 27 23:58:43 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 27 23:58:43 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 27 23:58:43 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 27 23:58:43 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9