[Thu Jun 20 07:20:25 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (284.1, 347.2) = 11 4 42.07 38 13 24.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 310.0 +/- 55.3
  Background counts = 173.8
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.002

[Thu Jun 20 07:20:29 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.69'
[Thu Jun 20 07:30:07 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.27 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun 20 07:30:07 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.27"
[Thu Jun 20 07:30:07 2013] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 11, frac = 0.477
[Thu Jun 20 07:30:07 2013] Skipping simple spatial due to low active detector fraction
[Fri Jun 21 10:54:58 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 3010.650000, observed total counts = 2268.000000
[Fri Jun 21 10:54:58 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 13
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 21 10:54:59 2013] Source 13 is offset by 3.440967 and 0.841865 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.930956 x 0.994372, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 21 10:54:59 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 21 10:54:59 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 21 10:54:59 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 21 10:54:59 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 21 10:54:59 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 21 10:54:59 2013] Source is confused with source 25
[Fri Jun 21 10:56:11 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.27 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 21 10:56:11 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.27"
[Fri Jun 21 10:56:11 2013] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 11, frac = 0.477
[Fri Jun 21 10:56:11 2013] Skipping simple spatial due to low active detector fraction
[Sat Jun 22 12:08:14 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 3010.710000, observed total counts = 2268.000000
[Sat Jun 22 12:08:14 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 13
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Jun 22 12:08:14 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Jun 22 12:08:14 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Jun 22 12:08:14 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Jun 22 12:08:14 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Jun 22 12:08:14 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Jun 22 12:09:13 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(24670.120117, 30160.070221, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat Jun 22 12:09:13 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0153950601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src13_src.reg
[Sat Jun 22 12:09:13 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0153950601_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (247, 310) - (322, 385)
[Sat Jun 22 12:09:13 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(24670.120117, 30160.070221, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27527.706909, 29260.156006, 5220.000000, 5220.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28137.360000, 29370.722860, 2137.339262, 1645.855247, 34.932000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28833.067993, 30246.815338, 2610.000000, 2610.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27087.232239, 30420.552490, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26528.542389, 30002.239349, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24015.719116, 27391.124237, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24225.323059, 32074.425995, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27249.828888, 31721.293823, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22972.937775, 32065.247559, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24344.486084, 30526.533295, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25159.888062, 29231.022369, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25018.850250, 27884.195038, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat Jun 22 12:09:13 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0153950601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src13.gif
[Sat Jun 22 13:17:39 2013] Mean detx,y = (506.53, -2634.31) 
[Sat Jun 22 13:17:44 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sat Jun 22 13:18:03 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sat Jun 22 13:18:04 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0153950601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src13_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat Jun 22 13:18:04 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0153950601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src13_bgd.pi.gz
[Sun Jun 23 12:22:52 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sun Jun 23 12:22:52 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sun Jun 23 18:10:30 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sun Jun 23 18:10:30 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0153950601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src13_src_b10.pi.gz = 2069.00
[Sun Jun 23 18:10:31 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0153950601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src13_bgd.pi.gz = 0.00
[Sun Jun 23 18:10:31 2013] Got source and background scale factors 1034035.000000, 0.000000
[Sun Jun 23 18:10:31 2013] Background scale factor is not positive, halting re-assessment of this source
[Sun Jun 23 18:10:37 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sun Jun 23 18:10:37 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00844, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0153950601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src13.arf
[Sun Jun 23 18:10:37 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sun Jun 23 18:10:37 2013] Updating source flux to 4.3e-14
[Sun Jun 23 18:11:43 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting
[Sun Jun 23 18:11:47 2013] xmm0153950601/analysis//spectral/fullrun_pn_xmm0153950601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src13_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete