[Mon Mar 26 10:13:54 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (283.2, 352.2) = 2 5 19.68 64 48 33.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 83.0 +/- 19.6
  Background counts = 127.7
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.001

[Mon Mar 26 10:13:54 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.05'
[Mon Mar 26 10:19:37 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.45 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Mar 26 10:19:37 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.45"
[Mon Mar 26 10:19:37 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.047
[Mon Mar 26 10:19:37 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 24 for pass 0, mean size = 8.45"
[Mon Mar 26 13:09:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 13:09:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.csv
[Mon Mar 26 13:09:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 13:09:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.csv
[Mon Mar 26 13:09:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Mar 26 13:09:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 13:09:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.csv
[Mon Mar 26 13:09:34 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 13:09:34 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.csv
[Mon Mar 26 13:09:34 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Mar 26 20:54:38 2012] Source 26 is offset by 2.739064 and -2.950933 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.075982 x 1.075982, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Mar 26 20:54:38 2012] Warning: source 24 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 26 at 10.524260 pixels away
[Mon Mar 26 20:54:38 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Mar 26 20:54:38 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Mar 26 20:54:38 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Mar 26 20:54:38 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Mar 26 20:54:38 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Mar 26 20:54:38 2012] Source is confused with source 18
[Mon Mar 26 20:54:38 2012] Source is confused with source 24
[Mon Mar 26 20:55:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.45 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Mar 26 20:55:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.45"
[Mon Mar 26 20:55:18 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.047
[Mon Mar 26 20:55:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 21 for pass 1, mean size = 8.45"
[Mon Mar 26 23:05:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 23:05:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.csv
[Mon Mar 26 23:05:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 23:05:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.csv
[Mon Mar 26 23:05:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Mar 26 23:05:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 23:05:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.csv
[Mon Mar 26 23:05:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg exists
[Mon Mar 26 23:05:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.csv
[Mon Mar 26 23:05:55 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0153752501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 27 05:13:15 2012] Warning, spatial fit 21 centroid is now closest to src. 18
[Tue Mar 27 05:13:15 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Mar 27 05:13:15 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Mar 27 05:13:15 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Mar 27 05:13:15 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Mar 27 05:13:15 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Mar 27 05:13:15 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9