[Mon Aug 27 16:09:55 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (371.0, 330.6) = 2 5 28.56 64 51 12.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 56.1 +/- 11.4
  Background counts = 28.5
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0009

[Mon Aug 27 16:09:55 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.75'
[Mon Aug 27 19:37:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.31 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Aug 27 19:37:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.31"
[Mon Aug 27 19:37:07 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.790
[Mon Aug 27 19:37:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 24 for pass 0, mean size = 9.31"
[Mon Aug 27 22:02:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 22:02:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.csv
[Mon Aug 27 22:02:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 22:02:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.csv
[Mon Aug 27 22:02:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src24.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Aug 27 22:02:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 22:02:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.csv
[Mon Aug 27 22:02:52 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 27 22:02:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.csv
[Mon Aug 27 22:02:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src24.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Aug 27 22:03:13 2012] Warning, spatial fit 24 centroid is now closest to src. 14
[Mon Aug 27 22:03:13 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Aug 27 22:03:13 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Aug 27 22:03:13 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Aug 27 22:03:13 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Aug 27 22:03:13 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Aug 27 22:03:13 2012] Source is confused with source 14
[Tue Aug 28 01:11:32 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.31 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Aug 28 01:11:32 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.31"
[Tue Aug 28 01:11:32 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.790
[Tue Aug 28 01:11:32 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 1, mean size = 9.31"
[Tue Aug 28 02:32:12 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 28 02:32:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Tue Aug 28 02:32:12 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 28 02:32:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Tue Aug 28 02:32:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 28 02:32:12 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 28 02:32:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Tue Aug 28 02:32:12 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug 28 02:32:12 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Tue Aug 28 02:32:12 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0153752401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug 28 02:32:29 2012] Source 13 is offset by -2.435103 and -9.123685 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 8.556736 x 4.491982, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Aug 28 02:32:29 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Aug 28 02:32:29 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Aug 28 02:32:29 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Aug 28 02:32:29 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Aug 28 02:32:29 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Aug 28 02:32:29 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9