[Wed Dec 28 14:51:19 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (323.1, 456.9) = 5 34 28.87 22 10 57.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 100.3 +/- 17.6
  Background counts = 68.8
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Wed Dec 28 14:51:22 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.63'
[Wed Dec 28 15:04:31 2011] Using EEF radius (= 12.24 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Dec 28 15:04:31 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.24"
[Wed Dec 28 15:04:31 2011] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.819
[Wed Dec 28 15:04:31 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 63 for pass 0, mean size = 12.24"
[Thu Dec 29 11:51:38 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0153750501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src63.ximg exists
[Thu Dec 29 11:51:38 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0153750501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src63.csv
[Thu Dec 29 11:51:38 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0153750501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src63_1.ximg exists
[Thu Dec 29 11:51:38 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0153750501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src63.csv
[Thu Dec 29 11:51:38 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0153750501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src63_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0153750501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src63.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Dec 29 11:51:41 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0153750501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src63.ximg exists
[Thu Dec 29 11:51:41 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0153750501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src63_1.ximg exists
[Thu Dec 29 11:51:41 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0153750501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src63 appears to have run properly
[Fri Dec 30 09:23:38 2011] Warning: source 33 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 64 at 12.317424 pixels away
[Fri Dec 30 09:23:38 2011] Warning: source 35 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 64 at 12.760623 pixels away
[Fri Dec 30 09:23:38 2011] Source 64 is offset by 3.745664 and -3.612063 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.953733 x 1.953733, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Dec 30 09:23:38 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 1416.960000, observed total counts = 1419.000000
[Fri Dec 30 09:23:38 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 64 = 0.809418 pixels
[Fri Dec 30 09:23:38 2011] 1267.236600 total counts/ 1250.550000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.471865
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 64 = 0.809418 pixels
  Position = (322.6, 456.2) = 5 34 29.01 22 10 56.2
  Extent = 3.1 (3.1-8.8)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 16.7 +/- 35.6
  Background counts = 1250.5
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.007
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability