[Mon May 27 15:25:10 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (250.4, 191.4) = 17 47 35.87 -30 10 35.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 116.2 +/- 19.6
  Background counts = 126.0
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0007

[Mon May 27 15:25:10 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.50'
[Mon May 27 15:34:55 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.68 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 27 15:34:55 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.68"
[Mon May 27 15:34:55 2013] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.031
[Mon May 27 15:34:55 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 60 for pass 0, mean size = 10.68"
[Mon May 27 18:28:54 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 18:28:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60.csv
[Mon May 27 18:28:54 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 18:28:54 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60.csv
[Mon May 27 18:28:54 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 18:28:55 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 18:28:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60.csv
[Mon May 27 18:28:55 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 18:28:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60.csv
[Mon May 27 18:28:55 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 28 06:39:27 2013] Warning, spatial fit 60 centroid is now closest to src. 70
[Tue May 28 06:39:27 2013] Source 69 is offset by 3.991862 and -0.781703 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.278933 x 1.278933, not incorporating fit results
[Tue May 28 06:39:27 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 28 06:39:27 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 28 06:39:27 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 28 06:39:27 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 28 06:39:27 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 28 06:39:27 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9