[Mon May 27 15:26:58 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (286.1, 210.8) = 17 47 23.88 -30 9 9.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 86.1 +/- 14.5
  Background counts = 61.8
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Mon May 27 15:26:58 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.41'
[Tue May 28 00:29:27 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.63 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue May 28 00:29:27 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.63"
[Tue May 28 00:29:27 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.746
[Tue May 28 00:29:27 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 29 for pass 0, mean size = 9.63"
[Tue May 28 06:39:02 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src29.ximg exists
[Tue May 28 06:39:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src29.csv
[Tue May 28 06:39:02 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src29_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 28 06:39:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src29.csv
[Tue May 28 06:39:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src29_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src29.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 28 06:39:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src29.ximg exists
[Tue May 28 06:39:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src29.csv
[Tue May 28 06:39:03 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src29_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 28 06:39:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src29.csv
[Tue May 28 06:39:03 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src29_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0152920101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src29.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 28 06:40:01 2013] Source 53 is offset by 1.114688 and 7.600863 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.177940 x 1.177940, not incorporating fit results
[Tue May 28 06:40:01 2013] Warning, spatial fit 29 centroid is now closest to src. 52
[Tue May 28 06:40:01 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 28 06:40:01 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 28 06:40:01 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue May 28 06:40:01 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 28 06:40:01 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue May 28 06:40:01 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9