[Tue Jul  3 14:33:09 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (303.5, 300.2) = 13 24 44.01 -57 38 5.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 73.3 +/- 15.2
  Background counts = 49.7
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.005

[Tue Jul  3 14:33:09 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.39'
[Tue Jul  3 14:34:42 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul  3 14:34:42 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.62"
[Tue Jul  3 14:34:42 2012] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.978
[Tue Jul  3 14:34:42 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 6.62"
[Tue Jul  3 15:00:45 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0152131201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  3 15:00:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0152131201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Tue Jul  3 15:00:45 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0152131201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  3 15:00:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0152131201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Tue Jul  3 15:00:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0152131201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0152131201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul  3 15:00:45 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0152131201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  3 15:00:45 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0152131201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  3 15:00:45 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0152131201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13 appears to have run properly
[Tue Jul  3 16:33:57 2012] Warning, spatial fit 13 centroid is now closest to src. 14
[Tue Jul  3 16:33:57 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul  3 16:33:57 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul  3 16:33:57 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul  3 16:33:57 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul  3 16:33:57 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul  3 16:33:57 2012] Source is confused with source 14
[Tue Jul  3 16:34:08 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul  3 16:34:08 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.62"
[Tue Jul  3 16:34:08 2012] source mask rpix=1.5, npix_max = 16, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.978
[Tue Jul  3 16:34:08 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 1, mean size = 6.62"
[Tue Jul  3 17:18:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0152131201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  3 17:18:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0152131201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  3 17:18:22 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0152131201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12 appears to have run properly
[Tue Jul  3 17:18:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0152131201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  3 17:18:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0152131201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul  3 17:18:22 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0152131201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12 appears to have run properly
[Tue Jul  3 18:33:08 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 889.924000, observed total counts = 889.000000
[Tue Jul  3 18:33:08 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 0.964462 pixels
[Tue Jul  3 18:33:08 2012] 885.583400 total counts/ 864.012000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.733869
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 13 = 0.964462 pixels
  Position = (304.1, 299.5) = 13 24 43.68 -57 38 9.4
  Extent = 4.6 (1.7-11.5)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 21.6 +/- 29.8
  Background counts = 864.0
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.008
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability