[Fri Sep  7 19:55:31 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (271.9, 287.0) = 17 6 37.53 23 58 35.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 68.4 +/- 14.1
  Background counts = 11.5
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.006

[Fri Sep  7 19:55:31 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.09'
[Fri Sep  7 20:03:25 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.48 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Sep  7 20:03:25 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.48"
[Fri Sep  7 20:03:25 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.610
[Fri Sep  7 20:03:25 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 7.48"
[Fri Sep  7 20:11:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists
[Fri Sep  7 20:11:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Fri Sep  7 20:11:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep  7 20:11:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Fri Sep  7 20:11:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Sep  7 20:11:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Fri Sep  7 20:11:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Fri Sep  7 20:11:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep  7 20:11:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Fri Sep  7 20:11:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Sep  7 20:11:56 2012] Warning, spatial fit 3 centroid is now closest to src. 2
[Fri Sep  7 20:11:56 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Sep  7 20:11:56 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Sep  7 20:11:56 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Sep  7 20:11:56 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Sep  7 20:11:56 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Sep  7 20:11:56 2012] Source is confused with source 2
[Fri Sep  7 20:15:19 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.48 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Sep  7 20:15:19 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.48"
[Fri Sep  7 20:15:19 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.610
[Fri Sep  7 20:15:19 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 1, mean size = 7.48"
[Fri Sep  7 20:26:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg exists
[Fri Sep  7 20:26:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Fri Sep  7 20:26:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep  7 20:26:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Fri Sep  7 20:26:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Sep  7 20:26:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Fri Sep  7 20:26:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Fri Sep  7 20:26:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Fri Sep  7 20:26:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Fri Sep  7 20:26:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0151240301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Sep  7 20:26:57 2012] Source 3 is offset by -6.931670 and 2.909105 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.906910 x 5.709150, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Sep  7 20:26:57 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Sep  7 20:26:57 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Sep  7 20:26:57 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Sep  7 20:26:57 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Sep  7 20:26:57 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Sep  7 20:26:57 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9