[Sun Mar 18 05:12:40 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (282.1, 290.9) = 17 6 34.48 23 58 55.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 145.0 +/- 31.6
  Background counts = 14.7
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.004

[Sun Mar 18 05:12:41 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.30'
[Sun Mar 18 05:42:27 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.08 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 18 05:42:27 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.08"
[Sun Mar 18 05:42:27 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.663
[Sun Mar 18 05:42:27 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 7.08"
[Sun Mar 18 07:50:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 07:50:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Sun Mar 18 07:50:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 07:50:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Sun Mar 18 07:50:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 07:50:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 07:50:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Sun Mar 18 07:50:22 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 07:50:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Sun Mar 18 07:50:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 08:17:17 2012] Source 5 is offset by 0.050314 and 6.318237 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.282800 x 2.282800, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Mar 18 08:17:17 2012] Warning, spatial fit 5 centroid is now closest to src. 1
[Sun Mar 18 08:17:17 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 18 08:17:17 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 18 08:17:17 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Mar 18 08:17:17 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 18 08:17:17 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 18 08:17:17 2012] Source is confused with source 2
[Sun Mar 18 08:29:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.08 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Mar 18 08:29:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.08"
[Sun Mar 18 08:29:29 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 12, frac = 0.663
[Sun Mar 18 08:29:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 7.08"
[Sun Mar 18 11:03:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 11:03:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Sun Mar 18 11:03:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 11:03:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Sun Mar 18 11:03:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 11:03:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 11:03:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Sun Mar 18 11:03:47 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sun Mar 18 11:03:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Sun Mar 18 11:03:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0151240201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Mar 18 11:46:26 2012] Warning, spatial fit 5 centroid is now closest to src. 4
[Sun Mar 18 11:46:26 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Mar 18 11:46:26 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Mar 18 11:46:26 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Mar 18 11:46:26 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Mar 18 11:46:26 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Mar 18 11:46:26 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9