[Wed May 16 03:21:23 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (179.0, 287.4) = 9 20 49.75 30 27 23.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 34.3 +/- 8.6
  Background counts = 18.7
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0006

[Wed May 16 03:21:23 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.70'
[Wed May 16 03:25:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 16 03:25:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.78"
[Wed May 16 03:25:10 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.846
[Wed May 16 03:25:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 60 for pass 0, mean size = 10.78"
[Wed May 16 06:54:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 06:54:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60.csv
[Wed May 16 06:54:31 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 06:54:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60.csv
[Wed May 16 06:54:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src60.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 16 06:54:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 06:54:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60.csv
[Wed May 16 06:54:33 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 06:54:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60.csv
[Wed May 16 06:54:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src60.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 16 12:56:56 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 381.444000, observed total counts = 290.000000
[Wed May 16 12:56:56 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 63
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed May 16 12:56:56 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 738.430000, observed total counts = 497.000000
[Wed May 16 12:56:56 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 63
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed May 16 12:56:56 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 16 12:56:56 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 16 12:56:56 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 16 12:56:56 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 16 12:56:56 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 16 12:57:51 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.78 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 16 12:57:51 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.78"
[Wed May 16 12:57:51 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.846
[Wed May 16 12:57:51 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 57 for pass 1, mean size = 10.78"
[Wed May 16 17:35:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 17:35:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.csv
[Wed May 16 17:35:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 17:35:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.csv
[Wed May 16 17:35:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src57.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 16 17:36:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 17:36:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57.csv
[Wed May 16 17:36:01 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 16 17:36:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57.csv
[Wed May 16 17:36:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0150620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src57.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 16 22:41:16 2012] Source 63 is offset by -1.224930 and -1.456817 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.273389 x 1.273389, not incorporating fit results
[Wed May 16 22:41:16 2012] Warning, spatial fit 57 centroid is now closest to src. 64
[Wed May 16 22:41:16 2012] Source 63 is offset by -2.204792 and 8.523045 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.270869 x 1.270869, not incorporating fit results
[Wed May 16 22:41:16 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 16 22:41:16 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 16 22:41:16 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 16 22:41:16 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 16 22:41:16 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 16 22:41:16 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9