[Sun May 12 02:25:39 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (283.5, 288.2) = 8 24 16.42 -43 1 9.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 113.0 +/- 18.7
  Background counts = 107.0
  Rate = 0.1 +/- 0.02

[Sun May 12 02:25:42 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.32'
[Sun May 12 02:26:58 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.09 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 12 02:26:58 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.09"
[Sun May 12 02:26:58 2013] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 19, frac = 1.048
[Sun May 12 02:26:58 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 45 for pass 0, mean size = 7.09"
[Sun May 12 02:27:01 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45.ximg exists
[Sun May 12 02:27:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45.csv
[Sun May 12 02:27:01 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 12 02:27:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45.csv
[Sun May 12 02:27:01 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 12 02:27:04 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45.ximg exists
[Sun May 12 02:27:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45.csv
[Sun May 12 02:27:04 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 12 02:27:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45.csv
[Sun May 12 02:27:04 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 12 02:28:12 2013] Warning, spatial fit 45 centroid is now closest to src. 73
[Sun May 12 02:28:12 2013] Source 75 is offset by 0.857737 and -5.291222 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.880154 x 0.831412, not incorporating fit results
[Sun May 12 02:28:12 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 12 02:28:12 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 12 02:28:12 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 12 02:28:12 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 12 02:28:12 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 12 02:28:12 2013] Source is confused with source 73
[Sun May 12 02:29:01 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.09 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun May 12 02:29:01 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.09"
[Sun May 12 02:29:01 2013] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 19, frac = 1.048
[Sun May 12 02:29:01 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 42 for pass 1, mean size = 7.09"
[Sun May 12 02:29:02 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src42.ximg exists
[Sun May 12 02:29:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src42.csv
[Sun May 12 02:29:02 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src42_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 12 02:29:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src42.csv
[Sun May 12 02:29:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src42_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src42.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 12 02:29:04 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src42.ximg exists
[Sun May 12 02:29:05 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src42.csv
[Sun May 12 02:29:05 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src42_1.ximg exists
[Sun May 12 02:29:05 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src42.csv
[Sun May 12 02:29:05 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src42_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src42.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun May 12 02:30:03 2013] Warning, spatial fit 42 centroid is now closest to src. 73
[Sun May 12 02:30:04 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun May 12 02:30:04 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun May 12 02:30:04 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun May 12 02:30:04 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun May 12 02:30:04 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun May 12 02:31:55 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(24612.349335, 25022.920410, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun May 12 02:31:55 2013] Not overwriting source region fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src75_src.reg
[Sun May 12 02:31:55 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (246, 251) - (321, 326)
[Sun May 12 02:31:56 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(24612.349335, 25022.920410, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24754.786000, 28232.498000, 1756.576051, 510.780815, 126.522000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26236.857600, 27935.482340, 1658.152048, 1658.152048, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26428.793000, 26979.350400, 1083.024031, 1083.024031, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24937.573000, 26358.556000, 1060.024031, 1060.024031, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23919.997345, 27338.687408, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27246.028000, 26860.354000, 1175.096034, 1175.096034, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23495.032000, 27016.052000, 1190.000034, 1190.000034, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23175.880249, 26445.283325, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25053.803711, 25463.615448, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24037.771790, 25463.636688, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun May 12 02:31:56 2013] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src75.gif
[Sun May 12 02:41:06 2013] Mean detx,y = (-1150.88, -2811.72) 
[Sun May 12 02:41:07 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sun May 12 02:41:30 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sun May 12 02:41:30 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src75_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sun May 12 02:41:30 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src75_bgd.pi.gz
[Sun May 12 03:28:50 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sun May 12 03:28:50 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sun May 12 04:25:41 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sun May 12 04:25:41 2013] Total counts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src75_src_b10.pi.gz = 583.00
[Sun May 12 04:25:41 2013] Total counts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src75_bgd.pi.gz = 811.00
[Sun May 12 04:25:41 2013] Got source and background scale factors 1115814.000000, 2562446.000000
[Sun May 12 04:25:41 2013] User source parameters:
  Position = (283.5, 288.2) = 8 24 16.42 -43 1 9.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0
  Source aperture counts = 229.9 +/- 25.2
  Background aperture counts = 353.1
  Rate = 0.4 +/- 0.04

[Sun May 12 04:25:41 2013] Updating counts from extracted products
[Sun May 12 04:25:41 2013] Set source signif. to 229.85/18.79 = 12.23
[Sun May 12 04:25:49 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sun May 12 04:25:49 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.369, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src75.arf
[Sun May 12 04:25:49 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sun May 12 04:25:49 2013] Updating source flux to 6.2e-12
[Sun May 12 04:26:12 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting
[Sun May 12 04:26:30 2013] xmm0150150201/analysis//spectral/fullrun_mos1_xmm0150150201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src75_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete