[Sat Jun 23 12:14:21 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (305.4, 344.2) = 18 19 12.97 -20 47 46.8 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 51.8 +/- 10.6 Background counts = 12.7 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004 [Sat Jun 23 12:14:21 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.36' [Sat Jun 23 13:05:00 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jun 23 13:05:00 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.11" [Sat Jun 23 13:05:00 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.118 [Sat Jun 23 13:05:00 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 27 for pass 0, mean size = 8.11" [Sat Jun 23 13:58:15 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0149610401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg exists [Sat Jun 23 13:58:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0149610401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv [Sat Jun 23 13:58:15 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0149610401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 23 13:58:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0149610401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.csv [Sat Jun 23 13:58:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0149610401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0149610401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src27.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat Jun 23 13:58:15 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0149610401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27.ximg exists [Sat Jun 23 13:58:15 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0149610401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 23 13:58:15 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0149610401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src27 appears to have run properly [Sat Jun 23 14:54:03 2012] Warning: source 27 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 16 at 10.802339 pixels away [Sat Jun 23 14:54:03 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat Jun 23 14:54:03 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat Jun 23 14:54:03 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sat Jun 23 14:54:03 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sat Jun 23 14:54:03 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Jun 23 14:54:03 2012] Source is confused with source 17 [Sat Jun 23 15:37:43 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.11 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jun 23 15:37:43 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.11" [Sat Jun 23 15:37:43 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.118 [Sat Jun 23 15:37:43 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 26 for pass 1, mean size = 8.11" [Sat Jun 23 16:32:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0149610401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26.ximg exists [Sat Jun 23 16:32:17 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0149610401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 23 16:32:17 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0149610401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src26 appears to have run properly [Sat Jun 23 16:32:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0149610401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26.ximg exists [Sat Jun 23 16:32:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0149610401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26_1.ximg exists [Sat Jun 23 16:32:18 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0149610401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src26 appears to have run properly [Sat Jun 23 17:41:16 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 257.605000, observed total counts = 251.000000 [Sat Jun 23 17:41:16 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 16 = 1.357559 pixels [Sat Jun 23 17:41:16 2012] 263.143900 total counts/ 239.043000 bgd. counts: snr = 1.558817 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 16 = 1.357559 pixels Position = (304.1, 343.9) = 18 19 13.38 -20 47 49.1 Extent = 8.1 (5.0-13.3)" x 2.2 (2.0-5.6)", rotation angle = 350 (321-5) degrees Source counts = 24.1 +/- 16.2 Background counts = 239.0 Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0005 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability