[Wed Aug 22 23:39:04 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (288.8, 368.9) = 5 40 7.72 -40 48 19.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 50.2 +/- 12.2
  Background counts = 36.8
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.001

[Wed Aug 22 23:39:04 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.16'
[Thu Aug 23 01:30:38 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug 23 01:30:38 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.01"
[Thu Aug 23 01:30:38 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.946
[Thu Aug 23 01:30:38 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 9.01"
[Thu Aug 23 03:40:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 23 03:40:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Thu Aug 23 03:40:50 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 23 03:40:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Thu Aug 23 03:40:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug 23 03:40:51 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 23 03:40:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Thu Aug 23 03:40:51 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 23 03:40:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Thu Aug 23 03:40:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug 23 05:04:24 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 648.969000, observed total counts = 577.000000
[Thu Aug 23 05:04:24 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 17
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Aug 23 05:04:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Aug 23 05:04:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Aug 23 05:04:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Aug 23 05:04:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Aug 23 05:04:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Aug 23 05:04:24 2012] Source is confused with source 22
[Thu Aug 23 07:19:36 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.01 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug 23 07:19:36 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.01"
[Thu Aug 23 07:19:36 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 26, mask sum = 25, frac = 0.946
[Thu Aug 23 07:19:36 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 21 for pass 1, mean size = 9.01"
[Thu Aug 23 09:33:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 23 09:33:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.csv
[Thu Aug 23 09:33:31 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 23 09:33:31 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.csv
[Thu Aug 23 09:33:31 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug 23 09:33:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 23 09:33:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.csv
[Thu Aug 23 09:33:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 23 09:33:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.csv
[Thu Aug 23 09:33:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0149420101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug 23 10:30:10 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 652.573000, observed total counts = 577.000000
[Thu Aug 23 10:30:10 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 17
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Aug 23 10:30:10 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Aug 23 10:30:10 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Aug 23 10:30:10 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Aug 23 10:30:10 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Aug 23 10:30:10 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Aug 23 10:30:10 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9