[Tue Jun 25 08:36:04 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (88.1, 300.9) = 23 52 40.66 -26 3 49.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 67.4 +/- 10.8
  Background counts = 8.5
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Tue Jun 25 08:36:05 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.25'
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:16 2013] Using EEF radius (= 14.05 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:16 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:16 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.05"
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:16 2013] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 41, frac = 0.736
[Tue Jun 25 10:14:16 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 30 for pass 0, mean size = 14.05"
[Tue Jun 25 11:25:20 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 11:25:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30.csv
[Tue Jun 25 11:25:20 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 11:25:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30.csv
[Tue Jun 25 11:25:20 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 11:25:21 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 11:25:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.csv
[Tue Jun 25 11:25:21 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 11:25:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.csv
[Tue Jun 25 11:25:21 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 12:36:36 2013] Warning: source 30 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 6 at 18.250797 pixels away
[Tue Jun 25 12:36:36 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 12:36:36 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 12:36:36 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 12:36:36 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 12:36:36 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 25 16:30:05 2013] Using EEF radius (= 14.05 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 16:30:05 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.05"
[Tue Jun 25 16:30:05 2013] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 41, frac = 0.736
[Tue Jun 25 16:30:05 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 21 for pass 1, mean size = 14.05"
[Tue Jun 25 17:22:31 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 17:22:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.csv
[Tue Jun 25 17:22:31 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 17:22:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.csv
[Tue Jun 25 17:22:31 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 17:22:31 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 17:22:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.csv
[Tue Jun 25 17:22:31 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 17:22:31 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.csv
[Tue Jun 25 17:22:31 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0148990101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 18:08:21 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 219.942000, observed total counts = 139.000000
[Tue Jun 25 18:08:21 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 6
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 25 18:08:21 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 18:08:21 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 18:08:21 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 18:08:21 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 18:08:21 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 25 18:08:21 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0