[Mon Jun 17 18:41:06 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (431.8, 377.9) = 4 24 50.57 -57 7 57.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 40.9 +/- 8.0
  Background counts = 3.5
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006

[Mon Jun 17 18:41:06 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.26'
[Mon Jun 17 19:23:40 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.06 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 17 19:23:40 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.06"
[Mon Jun 17 19:23:40 2013] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 32, frac = 0.747
[Mon Jun 17 19:23:40 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 0, mean size = 12.06"
[Mon Jun 17 19:58:12 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0148000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 19:58:12 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0148000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Mon Jun 17 19:58:12 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0148000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 19:58:12 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0148000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.csv
[Mon Jun 17 19:58:12 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0148000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0148000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 17 19:58:13 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0148000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 19:58:13 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0148000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 17 19:58:13 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0148000401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src12 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jun 17 20:32:54 2013] Source 9 is offset by 1.950566 and -2.698160 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 10.723541 x 2.172515, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 17 20:32:54 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 17 20:32:54 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 17 20:32:54 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 17 20:32:54 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 17 20:32:54 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 17 20:32:54 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9