[Tue Jun 11 02:08:59 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (161.8, 304.6) = 5 16 46.28 -0 7 22.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 167.0 +/- 21.3
  Background counts = 172.2
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0004

[Tue Jun 11 02:08:59 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.91'
[Tue Jun 11 03:45:52 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 11 03:45:52 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.39"
[Tue Jun 11 03:45:52 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 32, frac = 0.823
[Tue Jun 11 03:45:52 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 0, mean size = 11.39"
[Tue Jun 11 08:01:46 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 11 08:01:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Tue Jun 11 08:01:46 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 11 08:01:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Tue Jun 11 08:01:46 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 11 08:01:47 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 11 08:01:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Tue Jun 11 08:01:47 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 11 08:01:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Tue Jun 11 08:01:47 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 11 08:01:59 2013] Warning: source 11 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 19 at 10.414305 pixels away
[Tue Jun 11 08:01:59 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1000.790000, observed total counts = 829.000000
[Tue Jun 11 08:01:59 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 19
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 11 08:01:59 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 11 08:01:59 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 11 08:01:59 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 11 08:01:59 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 11 08:01:59 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 11 08:01:59 2013] Source is confused with source 18
[Tue Jun 11 11:27:35 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.39 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 11 11:27:35 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.39"
[Tue Jun 11 11:27:35 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 38, mask sum = 32, frac = 0.823
[Tue Jun 11 11:27:35 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 1, mean size = 11.39"
[Tue Jun 11 14:26:50 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 11 14:26:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Tue Jun 11 14:26:50 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 11 14:26:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Tue Jun 11 14:26:50 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 11 14:26:51 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 11 14:26:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Tue Jun 11 14:26:51 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 11 14:26:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Tue Jun 11 14:26:51 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0147190101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 11 14:27:00 2013] Warning: source 16 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 19 at 11.353755 pixels away
[Tue Jun 11 14:27:00 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 11 14:27:00 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 11 14:27:00 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 11 14:27:00 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 11 14:27:00 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 11 14:27:00 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9