[Mon Aug 20 10:45:31 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (317.4, 357.4) = 13 47 22.62 -33 7 16.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 91.5 +/- 16.4
  Background counts = 79.3
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006

[Mon Aug 20 10:45:31 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.49'
[Mon Aug 20 11:27:11 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Aug 20 11:27:11 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.67"
[Mon Aug 20 11:27:11 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.005
[Mon Aug 20 11:27:11 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 8.67"
[Mon Aug 20 11:48:10 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0147040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 20 11:48:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0147040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon Aug 20 11:48:10 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0147040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 20 11:48:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0147040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Mon Aug 20 11:48:10 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0147040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0147040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Aug 20 11:48:10 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0147040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 20 11:48:10 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0147040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 20 11:48:10 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0147040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Mon Aug 20 12:17:24 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 6 at 11.333372 pixels away
[Mon Aug 20 12:17:24 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Aug 20 12:17:24 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Aug 20 12:17:24 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Aug 20 12:17:24 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Aug 20 12:17:24 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Aug 20 12:49:10 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Aug 20 12:49:10 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.67"
[Mon Aug 20 12:49:10 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.005
[Mon Aug 20 12:49:10 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 8.67"
[Mon Aug 20 13:09:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0147040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 20 13:09:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0147040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 20 13:09:32 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0147040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9 appears to have run properly
[Mon Aug 20 13:09:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0147040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 20 13:09:32 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0147040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Mon Aug 20 13:09:32 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0147040101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly
[Mon Aug 20 13:30:57 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 787.026000, observed total counts = 767.000000
[Mon Aug 20 13:30:57 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 6 = 0.632448 pixels
[Mon Aug 20 13:30:57 2012] 785.771500 total counts/ 759.156000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.965982
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 6 = 0.632448 pixels
  Position = (317.1, 358.0) = 13 47 22.71 -33 7 16.0
  Extent = 2.2" x 2.2", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 26.6 +/- 28.0
  Background counts = 759.2
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.001
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability