[Thu Aug 30 07:01:51 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (196.6, 249.0) = 10 46 8.87 -59 43 9.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 73.9 +/- 11.4
  Background counts = 9.6
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Thu Aug 30 07:01:51 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.20'
[Thu Aug 30 07:52:41 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.53 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug 30 07:52:41 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.53"
[Thu Aug 30 07:52:41 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.055
[Thu Aug 30 07:52:41 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 10.53"
[Thu Aug 30 08:49:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 30 08:49:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Thu Aug 30 08:49:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 30 08:49:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Thu Aug 30 08:49:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug 30 08:49:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 30 08:49:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Thu Aug 30 08:49:23 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 30 08:49:23 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Thu Aug 30 08:49:23 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug 30 08:49:36 2012] Warning: source 14 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 20 at 14.857803 pixels away
[Thu Aug 30 08:49:36 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Aug 30 08:49:36 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Aug 30 08:49:36 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Aug 30 08:49:36 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Aug 30 08:49:36 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Aug 30 09:17:33 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.53 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug 30 09:17:33 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.53"
[Thu Aug 30 09:17:33 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 36, frac = 1.055
[Thu Aug 30 09:17:33 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 1, mean size = 10.53"
[Thu Aug 30 10:00:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 30 10:00:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Thu Aug 30 10:00:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 30 10:00:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Thu Aug 30 10:00:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug 30 10:00:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 30 10:00:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Thu Aug 30 10:00:39 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug 30 10:00:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Thu Aug 30 10:00:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0145740401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug 30 10:00:46 2012] Warning: source 13 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 20 at 12.533876 pixels away
[Thu Aug 30 10:00:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Aug 30 10:00:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Aug 30 10:00:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Aug 30 10:00:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Aug 30 10:00:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Aug 30 10:00:46 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9