[Thu Jul 12 01:47:49 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (265.0, 380.6) = 15 3 51.76 -41 43 34.8 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 463.4 +/- 32.4 Background counts = 146.3 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002 [Thu Jul 12 01:47:53 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.43' [Thu Jul 12 06:50:30 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.64 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu Jul 12 06:50:30 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.64" [Thu Jul 12 06:50:30 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.016 [Thu Jul 12 06:50:30 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 50 for pass 0, mean size = 9.64" [Thu Jul 12 12:56:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50.ximg exists [Thu Jul 12 12:56:06 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50_1.ximg exists [Thu Jul 12 12:56:06 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src50 appears to have run properly [Thu Jul 12 12:56:08 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.ximg exists [Thu Jul 12 12:56:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.csv [Thu Jul 12 12:56:08 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50_1.ximg exists [Thu Jul 12 12:56:08 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.csv [Thu Jul 12 12:56:08 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src50.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu Jul 12 22:34:15 2012] Source 50 is offset by -2.942716 and -2.313383 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.137949 x 1.137949, not incorporating fit results [Thu Jul 12 22:34:15 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3443.620000, observed total counts = 3128.000000 [Thu Jul 12 22:34:15 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 50 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Thu Jul 12 22:34:16 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu Jul 12 22:34:16 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu Jul 12 22:34:16 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Thu Jul 12 22:34:16 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Thu Jul 12 22:34:16 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu Jul 12 22:34:16 2012] Source is confused with source 55 [Fri Jul 13 04:58:24 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.64 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri Jul 13 04:58:24 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.64" [Fri Jul 13 04:58:24 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 30, frac = 1.016 [Fri Jul 13 04:58:24 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 47 for pass 1, mean size = 9.64" [Fri Jul 13 12:50:33 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src47.ximg exists [Fri Jul 13 12:50:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src47.csv [Fri Jul 13 12:50:33 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src47_1.ximg exists [Fri Jul 13 12:50:33 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src47.csv [Fri Jul 13 12:50:33 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src47_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src47.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jul 13 12:50:36 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src47.ximg exists [Fri Jul 13 12:50:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src47.csv [Fri Jul 13 12:50:36 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src47_1.ximg exists [Fri Jul 13 12:50:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src47.csv [Fri Jul 13 12:50:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src47_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src47.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri Jul 13 22:15:05 2012] Warning: source 42 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 50 at 26.994357 pixels away [Fri Jul 13 22:15:05 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 3448.880000, observed total counts = 3128.000000 [Fri Jul 13 22:15:05 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 50 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Fri Jul 13 22:15:05 2012] Warning: source 49 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 50 at 12.965469 pixels away [Fri Jul 13 22:15:05 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri Jul 13 22:15:05 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri Jul 13 22:15:05 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Fri Jul 13 22:15:05 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Fri Jul 13 22:15:05 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sat Jul 14 05:52:38 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(23002.469666, 33062.221680, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sat Jul 14 05:52:38 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src50_src.reg [Sat Jul 14 05:52:38 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (227, 343) - (302, 418) [Sat Jul 14 05:52:38 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(23002.469666, 33062.221680, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25704.816895, 34585.807587, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24227.518000, 33499.356000, 3019.376087, 3019.376087, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25939.824000, 34126.336000, 1728.016050, 1728.016050, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21653.851517, 30580.722443, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23584.652000, 32831.597600, 1508.424043, 1508.424043, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25290.308411, 33694.461151, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21544.164000, 29541.890000, 1401.800040, 1401.800040, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24068.952454, 34040.145966, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21963.247000, 31125.582000, 1142.000033, 1142.000033, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24183.509003, 31394.048187, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24575.340881, 32842.387909, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24575.448000, 30739.688000, 1166.160034, 1166.160034, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23195.859344, 32579.664795, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25412.946000, 33167.996000, 1479.840043, 472.190414, 338.460200, X, Y) && !ellipse(25807.585114, 32104.305695, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23136.304382, 31294.410248, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22200.554000, 31558.840000, 1483.408043, 1483.408043, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24057.358000, 30227.610000, 1353.144039, 1353.144039, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25111.636000, 31100.534000, 1357.312039, 1357.312039, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22518.140000, 32103.370000, 1508.424043, 1508.424043, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25028.662000, 32435.120000, 1509.688043, 1509.688043, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sat Jul 14 05:52:38 2012] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src50.gif [Sat Jul 14 07:43:14 2012] Mean detx,y = (6117.16, -2148.57) [Sat Jul 14 07:43:15 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Sat Jul 14 07:43:29 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Sat Jul 14 07:43:29 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src50_src_b10.pi.gz [Sat Jul 14 07:43:29 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src50_bgd.pi.gz [Sat Jul 14 11:34:37 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Sat Jul 14 11:34:37 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Sat Jul 14 20:24:46 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Sat Jul 14 20:24:46 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src50_src_b10.pi.gz [Sat Jul 14 20:24:49 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Sat Jul 14 20:24:49 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0217, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0143980201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src50.arf [Sat Jul 14 20:24:49 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Sat Jul 14 20:24:49 2012] Updating source flux to 2.9e-13 [Sat Jul 14 20:25:05 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting