[Fri Sep 30 22:22:12 2011] Detection parameters:
  Position = (233.1, 436.0) = 13 30 11.38 58 36 45.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 96.8 +/- 16.6
  Background counts = 43.9
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.001

[Fri Sep 30 22:22:14 2011] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.04'
[Fri Sep 30 23:41:09 2011] Using EEF radius (= 11.95 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Sep 30 23:41:09 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.95"
[Fri Sep 30 23:41:09 2011] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.854
[Fri Sep 30 23:41:09 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 11.95"
[Sat Oct  1 08:18:07 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0142770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 08:18:07 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0142770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Sat Oct  1 08:18:07 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0142770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 08:18:07 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0142770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Sat Oct  1 08:18:07 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0142770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0142770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Oct  1 08:18:10 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0142770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 08:18:10 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0142770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 08:18:10 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0142770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23 appears to have run properly
[Sat Oct  1 08:18:48 2011] Source 36 is offset by -7.571083 and 1.783587 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 10.448828 x 1.409807, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Oct  1 08:18:48 2011] Warning, spatial fit 23 centroid is now closest to src. 29
[Sat Oct  1 08:18:48 2011] Source 36 is offset by -1.827336 and 1.892460 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.423416 x 1.423416, not incorporating fit results
[Sat Oct  1 08:18:48 2011] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Oct  1 08:18:48 2011] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Oct  1 08:18:48 2011] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Oct  1 08:18:48 2011] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Oct  1 08:18:48 2011] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Oct  1 08:18:48 2011] Source is confused with source 11
[Sat Oct  1 09:23:43 2011] Using EEF radius (= 11.95 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Oct  1 09:23:43 2011] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.95"
[Sat Oct  1 09:23:43 2011] source mask rpix=2.7, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.854
[Sat Oct  1 09:23:43 2011] Giving source the simple spatial ID 19 for pass 1, mean size = 11.95"
[Sat Oct  1 16:46:16 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0142770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 16:46:16 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0142770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv
[Sat Oct  1 16:46:16 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0142770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 16:46:16 2011] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0142770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.csv
[Sat Oct  1 16:46:16 2011] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0142770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0142770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src19.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Oct  1 16:46:17 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0142770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 16:46:17 2011] fullrun_mos1_xmm0142770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19_1.ximg exists
[Sat Oct  1 16:46:17 2011] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0142770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src19 appears to have run properly
[Sat Oct  1 16:46:34 2011] Warning, spatial fit 19 centroid is now closest to src. 29
[Sat Oct  1 16:46:34 2011] Spatial fit model total counts = 563.961000, observed total counts = 565.000000
[Sat Oct  1 16:46:34 2011] Offset between fit and detection position for source 36 = 3.492341 pixels
[Sat Oct  1 16:46:34 2011] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 19 to 44
[Sat Oct  1 16:46:34 2011] 411.794018 total counts/ 411.794000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.000001
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 36 = 3.492341 pixels
  Position = (231.1, 438.9) = 13 30 12.48 58 36 58.2
  Extent = 25.2 (3.2-47.3)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 0.0 +/- 20.3
  Background counts = 411.8
  Rate = 1e-09 +/- 0.002
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability